02.06.2013 Views

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in sitting position. The difference is 4,67 %<br />

of total length of thoracolumbal spine. On<br />

the contrary as point x as the peak of lumbal<br />

lordosis (point L) are relatively more<br />

near to point C in sitting than in standing<br />

position (differences are 2,69 % and 9,49 %<br />

of the distance of points C and Lu). From<br />

the examined differences then it follows<br />

the moderate displacement of the peak of<br />

thoracic kyphosis in sitting position caudal,<br />

of lumbar lordosis on contrary cranial. The<br />

constructed point x in sitting position is<br />

shifted in average of the upper direction<br />

only about 20,39 mm;this is – as I said already<br />

– only 2,69 % of arithmetical mean of<br />

thoracolumbal spine in standing position,<br />

also substantial less distance than the point<br />

L. As it follows from calculated indexes of<br />

variability, individual most variable in both<br />

research positions is the placement of the<br />

peak of thoracic kyphosis (point T).<br />

We also tested the percentuel differences<br />

of the distances the points T, x and<br />

Lfrom the point Cervicale (C) between the<br />

standing and sitting positions. In accordance<br />

with it, we established the statistical significant<br />

differences for the peak of lumbar lordosis<br />

only, also for the point L (table 4.).<br />

It is possible presumed from advance<br />

findings, that short of thoracolumbal spine<br />

in sitting position (contrary to standing<br />

position) sets above all in region of low<br />

part, then in lumbar section.<br />

Average perpendicular distance of the<br />

peaks of both anteroposterior curves of thoracolumbal<br />

spine in standing position (T – L)<br />

is 236,43 mm, whereas in sitting position it<br />

is 167,57 mm. Given values are 53,13 % of<br />

total length of this section in standing and<br />

38,97 % in sitting positions. The difference<br />

68,86 mm between both these data is the<br />

length of shortening between the peaks of<br />

X s s x V<br />

mm % mm % mm % %<br />

T 141,60 31,82 34,17 7,68 3,38 0,76 24,00<br />

x 261,40 58,74 24,74 5,56 2,44 0,55 9,00<br />

L 378,03 84,95 25,59 5,75 2,54 0,57 7,00<br />

sitting position<br />

T 156,91 36,49 28,51 6,63 2,84 0,66 18,00<br />

x 241,01 56,05 30,66 7,13 3,05 0,71 13,00<br />

L 324,48 75,46 40,29 9,37 4,00 0,93 12,00<br />

Tab. 3. Distance of points T, x and L of thoracolumbal spine from the point C in standing and sitting<br />

positions. The percents from total length of thoracolumbal spine (C – Lu) in standing and sitting<br />

positions.<br />

h (P) C – T C – x C – L<br />

h (99 %) ± 12,02 ± 12,69 ± 9,21<br />

h (95 %) ± 9,13 ± 9,64 ± 6,99<br />

Tab. 4. Limit of statistical conclusive evidence of percentual differences of the distance of points T, x<br />

and L from the point C in standing and sitting positions.<br />

POHYBOVÉ ÚSTROJÍ, ročník 9, <strong>2002</strong>, č. <strong>3+</strong>4 95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!