02.06.2013 Views

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in every <strong>pro</strong>bands were measured body<br />

height by helping of anthropometer and<br />

body weight by tread electronicall scale.<br />

Body Mass Index was calculated from both<br />

these values.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Mean values and other accepted statistical<br />

characteristics of body height, weight<br />

and BMI of research group are referred in<br />

table 1. Their comparisons with all-state<br />

data of 20 – 25 years old Czech women,<br />

which we have taken in our research during<br />

the years 1987–88 (Hajniš et al. 1999),<br />

exposed that the research group of university<br />

students are in average about 1,5 cm<br />

taller and ap<strong>pro</strong>ximately about 1,4 kg<br />

lighter. This find is doubtless in connection<br />

with the known reality, that the university<br />

students in comparison with other populations<br />

are regularly higher, but lighter.<br />

Owing to we state contrary to our normal<br />

population at the same age ap<strong>pro</strong>ximately<br />

about 0,9 index units lower Body Mass<br />

Index. The <strong>pro</strong>bands of research group are<br />

therefore within the bounds of normosomy<br />

but they are explicitly slimmer.<br />

Tab. 2. The length of thoracolumbal spine in standing and sitting positions<br />

94<br />

LOCOMOTOR SYSTEM vol. 9, <strong>2002</strong>, No. <strong>3+</strong>4<br />

We suppose the length of thoracolumbal<br />

spine has the high dependence to stature<br />

and the deep of anteroposterior spine<br />

curves is in connection with body weight.<br />

Calculated mean of the length of thoracolumbal<br />

spine of the researched 18–25<br />

years women in standing and sitting positions<br />

gives the table 2. Of course, it means<br />

that the greater average of length exists in<br />

standing than in sitting position. The shortness<br />

in sitting position can be connected<br />

with the change of muscles tension of musculi<br />

dorsi,with the diverse degree of load of<br />

disci intervertebrales and with the different<br />

biomechanical system of abdominal and<br />

thoracical organs hinge. The average difference<br />

of the length between the points Cervicale<br />

and Lumbale in standing and sitting<br />

positions is 15 mm and is high statistically<br />

significant at the <strong>pro</strong>bability level of 99 %<br />

(t-value = 44,01).<br />

The placement of peak of both anteroposterior<br />

curves of thoracolumbal spine<br />

and of point x with regard to point C in<br />

standing and sitting positions gives the<br />

table 3. From this table is perceptible, that<br />

the peak of thoracic kyphosis (point T) is<br />

relatively more near to point C (this is to<br />

the seventh neck vertebra) in standing than<br />

X s s x V<br />

Body height [cm] 168,10 6,38 0,63 3,79<br />

Body weight [kg] 61,09 8,02 0,80 13,13<br />

Body Mass Index 21,59 2,45 0,24 11,34<br />

Tab. 1. Body height, weight and Body Mass Index of <strong>pro</strong>bands (18–25 years woman; n = 101)<br />

X s s x V<br />

C – Lu standing 444,76 23,90 2,40 5,37<br />

(mm) sitting 429,82 24,40 2,40 5,67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!