3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně
3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně
3+ 4/2002 - Společnost pro pojivové tkáně
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
in every <strong>pro</strong>bands were measured body<br />
height by helping of anthropometer and<br />
body weight by tread electronicall scale.<br />
Body Mass Index was calculated from both<br />
these values.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Mean values and other accepted statistical<br />
characteristics of body height, weight<br />
and BMI of research group are referred in<br />
table 1. Their comparisons with all-state<br />
data of 20 – 25 years old Czech women,<br />
which we have taken in our research during<br />
the years 1987–88 (Hajniš et al. 1999),<br />
exposed that the research group of university<br />
students are in average about 1,5 cm<br />
taller and ap<strong>pro</strong>ximately about 1,4 kg<br />
lighter. This find is doubtless in connection<br />
with the known reality, that the university<br />
students in comparison with other populations<br />
are regularly higher, but lighter.<br />
Owing to we state contrary to our normal<br />
population at the same age ap<strong>pro</strong>ximately<br />
about 0,9 index units lower Body Mass<br />
Index. The <strong>pro</strong>bands of research group are<br />
therefore within the bounds of normosomy<br />
but they are explicitly slimmer.<br />
Tab. 2. The length of thoracolumbal spine in standing and sitting positions<br />
94<br />
LOCOMOTOR SYSTEM vol. 9, <strong>2002</strong>, No. <strong>3+</strong>4<br />
We suppose the length of thoracolumbal<br />
spine has the high dependence to stature<br />
and the deep of anteroposterior spine<br />
curves is in connection with body weight.<br />
Calculated mean of the length of thoracolumbal<br />
spine of the researched 18–25<br />
years women in standing and sitting positions<br />
gives the table 2. Of course, it means<br />
that the greater average of length exists in<br />
standing than in sitting position. The shortness<br />
in sitting position can be connected<br />
with the change of muscles tension of musculi<br />
dorsi,with the diverse degree of load of<br />
disci intervertebrales and with the different<br />
biomechanical system of abdominal and<br />
thoracical organs hinge. The average difference<br />
of the length between the points Cervicale<br />
and Lumbale in standing and sitting<br />
positions is 15 mm and is high statistically<br />
significant at the <strong>pro</strong>bability level of 99 %<br />
(t-value = 44,01).<br />
The placement of peak of both anteroposterior<br />
curves of thoracolumbal spine<br />
and of point x with regard to point C in<br />
standing and sitting positions gives the<br />
table 3. From this table is perceptible, that<br />
the peak of thoracic kyphosis (point T) is<br />
relatively more near to point C (this is to<br />
the seventh neck vertebra) in standing than<br />
X s s x V<br />
Body height [cm] 168,10 6,38 0,63 3,79<br />
Body weight [kg] 61,09 8,02 0,80 13,13<br />
Body Mass Index 21,59 2,45 0,24 11,34<br />
Tab. 1. Body height, weight and Body Mass Index of <strong>pro</strong>bands (18–25 years woman; n = 101)<br />
X s s x V<br />
C – Lu standing 444,76 23,90 2,40 5,37<br />
(mm) sitting 429,82 24,40 2,40 5,67