03.06.2013 Views

Institution

Institution

Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

)<br />

_/<br />

single bottom-sediment sample (Core KN25-4GPC, 548 em) with<br />

hi gh montmori 11 oni te and mi xed-l ayer mi nera 1 content were<br />

made, using different sample concentrations on each silver<br />

filter. Concentrations of samples on ten filters ranged<br />

from 0.025 mg/cm2 to 6.4 mg/cm2, and they were checked by<br />

weighing similar aliquots filtered onto preweighed Nuclepore<br />

filters (0.4 ~m pore size). The effect of particle size on<br />

the analysis of each sample was assumed to be uniform since<br />

all aliquots were taken from the same dispersed sediment<br />

sample. Instrument conditions and x-ray procedures are<br />

described in Chapter iv.<br />

Fairly consistent mineralogical compositions were<br />

observed at sample concentrations greater than about<br />

1.6 mg/cm2 (7.28 ~m sample thickness; Table 7.1) using the<br />

peaks and weighting factors of either Hathaway (1972a) or<br />

Biscaye (1965). At lower sample concentrations, however,<br />

there is a marked decrease in the calculated abundance of<br />

montmorillonite and montmorillonite + mixed-layer material,<br />

with a corresponding increase of illite. No basal<br />

reflections are recorded in the x-ray diffraction pattern<br />

202<br />

below concentrations of about 0.1 mg/cm2 (0.22 ~m thickness).<br />

The abundance of kaolinite and chlorite is quite<br />

uni form when determi ned by ei ther method of cal cul ati on<br />

where basal reflections (peaks) are well enough developed<br />

to facilitate comparison. The exception is that these two<br />

minerals appear to increase slightly in abundance at high

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!