03.06.2013 Views

Institution

Institution

Institution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cannot always be accepted at face value when low sample.<br />

concentrations, such as those of suspended matter, are used.<br />

The five suspended-matter samples collected directly<br />

on silver filters on shipboard were x-rayed under the same<br />

conditions as the bottom-sediment samples (see Chapter iv)<br />

in order to make mineralogical comparisons with the bottom<br />

sediment and to determine whether the suspended matter<br />

may be a source for sediment on the Greater Antilles Outer<br />

Ridge. These samples were not treated before analysis<br />

becaus e 0 f the mi nute q uan ti ti es coll ected. Howeve r,<br />

results of the SEM studies indicate that the effects of<br />

organi c aggregates and amorphous si 1 i ca on the analyses<br />

should be minimal. Calculations of composition (Table 7.2)<br />

were made using the peaks and weighting factors of<br />

Hathaway (1972a). The calculations were based on the<br />

assumption that the entire suspended-matter sample was<br />

com~osed of layer silicates. While not true in the<br />

strictest sense (i.e. the SEM studies indicate that quartz,<br />

plagioclase, and biogenic tests may constitute up to 15%<br />

of the sample~ the assumption is justified because the<br />

quartz and feldspar peaks are virtually unidentifiable in<br />

the x-ray diffractogram.<br />

Re s u 1 ts<br />

Chlorite and kaolinite constitute about 2 parts in 10<br />

of the suspended matter (Table 7.2), as they do in the<br />

c 2 ~m fraction of the underlying sediment (Table 4.1).<br />

207<br />

)<br />

)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!