06.06.2013 Views

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Product responsibility<br />

substances were combusted in hazardous waste incinerators,<br />

mostly in the Netherlands (AVR Rotterdam) and Great Britain<br />

(Shanks, formerly Rechem).<br />

However, waste incinerators worldwide are a significant source<br />

of <strong>POPs</strong> themselves. To facilitate safe destruction, the new <strong>POPs</strong><br />

treaty includes specific provisions for the safe disposal of<br />

obsolete stockpiles of <strong>POPs</strong> using appropriate, non-incineration<br />

destruction technologies that do not create <strong>POPs</strong>.<br />

The few countries that benefitted from the aid/development<br />

support included: Niger (1991),Uganda (1993), Madagascar<br />

(1993), Mozambique (1994), Tanzania (1995/96), Zambia<br />

(1997), Seychelles (1997) Mauritania (1997) and the Gambia<br />

(<strong>2000</strong>), and now Ethiopia (2001), as far as Africa is concerned. 3<br />

In the meantime, industry under it’s umbrella GCPF 4 has in<br />

principle recognised its product responsibility. It promised to<br />

dispose of obsolete pesticide stockpiles that can be traced to it.<br />

This is yet to be seen. At the same time, however, the world<br />

organization of pesticide producers stresses that it is not<br />

responsible for stocks already held by recipient countries or<br />

governments. 5<br />

The industry organization has stated its willingness to provide<br />

support to governments like Chad, Mozambique or Somalia with<br />

the disposal of obsolete stocks owing to difficult circumstances<br />

that these countries are facing. 6 This too, is yet to be seen .<br />

The industry has committed itself, through its umbrella<br />

organization GCPF, to bear “one quarter of the disposal costs or<br />

"$ 1 per litre/kilogram"; but according to FAO, the industry "is<br />

yet to be seen fulfilling its commitment". 7<br />

Alarmingly, the GCPF has also said that in “hunger<br />

countries like Ethiopia” obsolete pesticides should rather be<br />

sprayed over the land instead of unertaking costly retrieval<br />

actions.<br />

FAO states that as of 1999 only 5% of all obsolete pesticides<br />

identified so far have been removed from Africa. It is stated that<br />

if the present pace continues, the whole process of eliminating<br />

obsolete pesticides from Africa would take fifty years. FAO calls<br />

for a concerted international action to solve the problem more<br />

quickly.<br />

3<br />

FAO 1999, 2001, GCPF <strong>2000</strong><br />

4<br />

Global Crop Protection Federation<br />

5<br />

Global Crop Protection Federation: “Obsolete Stocks of Crop Protection Products“. GCPF Position, May 1999;<br />

www.gcpf.org<br />

6<br />

“... assistance ... on a case-by-case basis ... will be an individual company decision.” (ibid.)<br />

7<br />

A. Wodageneh interview with Greenpeace; see also: Pesticide Action Network North America PANNA:<br />

“Obsolete Pesticides - An Ongoing Dilemma“; www.chebucto.ns.ca<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!