POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte
POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte
POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GCPF defines itself as „the industry“, and praises, e.g., Shell<br />
for having removed outdated pesticides from Mauritania.<br />
However, Shell was not a member of GCPF and furthermore<br />
was only marginally involved in the action. It is true that Shell<br />
contributed a sum of about US$ 300,000 (37.5% of the total) for<br />
dieldrin that it had produced. This contribution only happened<br />
after a disastrous loss of image due to the company’s plans to<br />
dump a decommissioned oil installation, the „Brent Spar“, in<br />
the sea. At the same time Shell was under heavy criticism<br />
because of it’s collusion with the Nigerian military regime in<br />
the Ogoni land.<br />
Shell‘s engagement regarding “obsolete pesticides“ ceased<br />
abruptly therafter, but the image campaign is still ongoing.<br />
Shell praises itself on the Mauritania case in advertisements in<br />
major International magazines such as Newsweek, Times<br />
Magazine, The Economist, and the Washington Post. under the<br />
slogan “Clean-up-or-cover-up“. The money they spent over the<br />
last years for advertising their little clean up project would have<br />
been able to pay for a clean up of stocks in another country.<br />
GCPF in 2001 gives an impression as if it’s member companies<br />
were actively involved in clean-ups in 15 countries around the<br />
globe. 8 This is not correct. In reality, GCPF companies were<br />
actively involved in only two cases:<br />
1. It contributed directly US$ 58,000 for its own supervision of<br />
the Gambia disposal of about 12 tonnes. An additional sum also<br />
was contributed to the same operation by ODA in UK. (see<br />
country section Gambia).<br />
2. A second direct contribution of US$ 133,000 was made for a<br />
disposal of obsolete pesticides from Madagascar. But this action<br />
also received contribution by from Government of Madagascar<br />
both in kind and finances, the Swiss Development Cooperation<br />
Agency, and GTZ.<br />
Any disposal operation that has taken place by GCPF, in Africa<br />
or elsewhere, only involved cleaning up their own vending<br />
stores, and had nothing to do with fulfilling their responsibility<br />
for the problems they have created nor with respect to the<br />
international collaborative effort to eradicate obsolete<br />
pesticide/chemical stockpiles.<br />
8 Chris Waller, GCPF spokesman, in Poznan, Poland at the 6 th HCH and Pesticides Forum 21.3.01, see also www.gcpf.org,<br />
March 2001<br />
13