06.06.2013 Views

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GCPF defines itself as „the industry“, and praises, e.g., Shell<br />

for having removed outdated pesticides from Mauritania.<br />

However, Shell was not a member of GCPF and furthermore<br />

was only marginally involved in the action. It is true that Shell<br />

contributed a sum of about US$ 300,000 (37.5% of the total) for<br />

dieldrin that it had produced. This contribution only happened<br />

after a disastrous loss of image due to the company’s plans to<br />

dump a decommissioned oil installation, the „Brent Spar“, in<br />

the sea. At the same time Shell was under heavy criticism<br />

because of it’s collusion with the Nigerian military regime in<br />

the Ogoni land.<br />

Shell‘s engagement regarding “obsolete pesticides“ ceased<br />

abruptly therafter, but the image campaign is still ongoing.<br />

Shell praises itself on the Mauritania case in advertisements in<br />

major International magazines such as Newsweek, Times<br />

Magazine, The Economist, and the Washington Post. under the<br />

slogan “Clean-up-or-cover-up“. The money they spent over the<br />

last years for advertising their little clean up project would have<br />

been able to pay for a clean up of stocks in another country.<br />

GCPF in 2001 gives an impression as if it’s member companies<br />

were actively involved in clean-ups in 15 countries around the<br />

globe. 8 This is not correct. In reality, GCPF companies were<br />

actively involved in only two cases:<br />

1. It contributed directly US$ 58,000 for its own supervision of<br />

the Gambia disposal of about 12 tonnes. An additional sum also<br />

was contributed to the same operation by ODA in UK. (see<br />

country section Gambia).<br />

2. A second direct contribution of US$ 133,000 was made for a<br />

disposal of obsolete pesticides from Madagascar. But this action<br />

also received contribution by from Government of Madagascar<br />

both in kind and finances, the Swiss Development Cooperation<br />

Agency, and GTZ.<br />

Any disposal operation that has taken place by GCPF, in Africa<br />

or elsewhere, only involved cleaning up their own vending<br />

stores, and had nothing to do with fulfilling their responsibility<br />

for the problems they have created nor with respect to the<br />

international collaborative effort to eradicate obsolete<br />

pesticide/chemical stockpiles.<br />

8 Chris Waller, GCPF spokesman, in Poznan, Poland at the 6 th HCH and Pesticides Forum 21.3.01, see also www.gcpf.org,<br />

March 2001<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!