06.06.2013 Views

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

POPs IN AFRICA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRADE 1980 - 2000 ... - Arte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>POPs</strong> treaty<br />

With these destructive practices banned under international law,<br />

the environmental and human health will greatly benefit. And,<br />

with these cheap disposal methods closed off, industries<br />

generating hazardous wastes and toxic chemicals will have much<br />

greater incentive to implement clean production methods that do<br />

not result in the use and release of toxic substances in the<br />

environment.<br />

The subsequent issue in need of global focus, and continued<br />

African leadership was, and is the issue of Persistent Organic<br />

Pollutants (<strong>POPs</strong>). Under the auspices of the UNEP, the<br />

international community began negotiating a global treaty in<br />

1998 to ban the worst of the toxic chemicals. To be adopted in<br />

May 2001 in Stockholm, the <strong>POPs</strong> treaty includes necessary<br />

provisions that resulted, to a large extent, due to the continuing<br />

political leadership that Africa, among others, has provided.<br />

After five official Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee<br />

meetings (<strong>IN</strong>Cs) to draft the <strong>POPs</strong> Convention, the international<br />

community, led by Africa (and other developing countries with<br />

China), and the European Union (EU) have moved in the right<br />

direction to produce a treaty for the purpose of preventing new<br />

<strong>POPs</strong> and eliminating existing <strong>POPs</strong>. The <strong>POPs</strong> treaty, or<br />

Stockholm Convention will now depend on the necessary<br />

political and industrial will to ensure its expeditious and effective<br />

implementation.<br />

But leadership and strong resolve was again necessary during<br />

the final negotiations of the <strong>POPs</strong> treaty in order to produce the<br />

provisions capable of adequately addressing the toxics crisis.<br />

The same political dynamic existed in the <strong>POPs</strong> context as in the<br />

other issues, e.g., waste trade discussed above. A few wealthy<br />

industrialised countries led by the US continued to attempt to<br />

create a weak ineffective draft text at the expense of our future.<br />

Fortunately, the will and resolve of the majority of States led by<br />

the EU and Africa prevailed over these few industrialised<br />

governments unwilling to make the needed changes toward<br />

sustainable development.<br />

In addition to the <strong>POPs</strong> treaty having the potential to phase out<br />

all <strong>POPs</strong>, it provides an opportunity to mobilise the international<br />

community to finally address and solve the legacy and on-going<br />

crisis of obsolete pesticide stockpiles, a significant portion of<br />

which are <strong>POPs</strong>.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!