WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 19: Ranking of Species Per Site based on average culm weight Ranking of Species per Trial Site according to Weight (Kg) DM of Culms Rank Species Trial Site H D WT DM AC EY CY 1 D. brandisii Gede 15 10 18 29.7 6 17.8 7.1 2 B. vulgaris Gede 8 6 8 4.3 30 13.0 5.2 3 B. bambos Gede 9 5 7.5 3.8 25 9.4 3.8 4 D. hamiltonii Gede 9 5 7.5 3.8 30 11.3 4.5 5 D. strictus Gede 9 3 11.3 3.0 25 7.5 3.0 6 D. membranaceus Gede 9 5 5 2.6 28 7.2 2.9 7 T. siamensis Gede 6 2.5 9.4 1.4 39 5.4 2.2 1 B. bambos Jilore 15 9 13.5 18.3 22 40.2 16.1 2 D. membranaceus Jilore 12 7 10 9.4 39 36.8 14.7 3 D. hamiltonii Jilore 10 6 9 6.0 28 16.9 6.8 1 D. brandisii Kakamega 12 11 15 22.3 17 37.9 15.2 2 D. hamiltonii Kakamega 10 10 10 11.5 19 21.8 8.7 3 D. strictus Kakamega 5 7 25 8.7 11 9.6 3.8 4 B. vulgaris Kakamega 8 7 9 5.7 28 16.0 6.4 5 B. tulda Kakamega 6 7 10 4.7 17 8.0 3.2 6 D. membranaceus Kakamega 7 7 8 4.5 17 7.6 3.0 7 B. bambos Kakamega 4 7 10 3.1 22 6.9 2.8 8 T. siamensis Kakamega 5 2.5 9 1.1 28 3.1 1.2 1 D. brandisii Muguga 10 10 18 19.8 17 33.7 13.5 2 D. hamiltonii Muguga 9 10 10 10.3 28 29.0 11.6 3 D. strictus Muguga 5 6 23 6.7 11 7.4 3.0 4 B. vulgaris Muguga 7 7 9 5.0 28 14.0 5.6 5 B. tulda Muguga 6 7 10 4.7 17 8.0 3.2 6 C. pergracile Muguga 10 6 5 3.5 17 5.9 2.4 7 D. membranaceus Muguga 7 6 6 2.9 17 4.9 2.0 8 B. bambos Muguga 4 6 9 2.4 22 5.3 2.1 9 T. siamensis Muguga 5 3 9 2.4 28 6.8 2.7 VIII World Bamboo Congress Proceedings Vol 4-129
Table 20: General Ranking of Species based on Average Culm Height Ranking of Species in the various trial sites according to Height (m) of Culms Rank Species Trial Site H D WT DM AC EY CY 1 B. bambos Jilore 15 9 13.5 18.3 22 40.2 16.1 2 D. brandisii Gede 15 10 18 29.7 6 17.8 7.1 3 D. brandisii Kakamega 12 11 15 22.3 17 37.9 15.2 4 D. membranaceus Jilore 12 7 10 9.4 39 36.8 14.7 5 D. brandisii Muguga 10 10 18 19.8 17 33.7 13.5 6 D. hamiltonii Kakamega 10 10 10 11.5 19 21.8 8.7 7 D. hamiltonii Jilore 10 6 9 6.0 28 16.9 6.8 8 C. pergracile Muguga 10 6 5 3.5 17 5.9 2.4 9 D. hamiltonii Muguga 9 10 10 10.3 28 29.0 11.6 10 D. hamiltonii Gede 9 5 7.5 3.8 30 11.3 4.5 11 B. bambos Gede 9 5 7.5 3.8 25 9.4 3.8 12 D. strictus Gede 9 3 11.3 3.0 25 7.5 3.0 13 D. membranaceus Gede 9 5 5 2.6 28 7.2 2.9 14 B. vulgaris Kakamega 8 7 9 5.7 28 16.0 6.4 15 B. vulgaris Gede 8 6 8 4.3 30 13.0 5.2 16 B. vulgaris Muguga 7 7 9 5.0 28 14.0 5.6 17 D. membranaceus Kakamega 7 7 8 4.5 17 7.6 3.0 18 D. membranaceus Muguga 7 6 6 2.9 17 4.9 2.0 19 B. tulda Kakamega 6 7 10 4.7 17 8.0 3.2 20 B. tulda Muguga 6 7 10 4.7 17 8.0 3.2 21 T. siamensis Gede 6 2.5 9.4 1.4 39 5.4 2.2 22 D. strictus Kakamega 5 7 25 8.7 11 9.6 3.8 23 D. strictus Muguga 5 6 23 6.7 11 7.4 3.0 24 T. siamensis Muguga 5 3 9 2.4 28 6.8 2.7 25 T. siamensis Kakamega 5 2.5 9 1.1 28 3.1 1.2 26 B. bambos Kakamega 4 7 10 3.1 22 6.9 2.8 27 B. bambos Muguga 4 6 9 2.4 22 5.3 2.1 VIII World Bamboo Congress Proceedings Vol 4-130
Page 1 and 2:
VOLUME 4 Resources - Forestry, Plan
Page 3 and 4:
Planning, Designing and Implementin
Page 5 and 6:
As indicated earlier, the major ind
Page 7 and 8:
Soil : Most bamboos are found in sa
Page 9 and 10:
Financial aspects: Unit cost- The u
Page 11 and 12:
Repayment period The bank loan was
Page 13 and 14:
promoting new bamboo projects throu
Page 15 and 16:
Planning Commission, 2003. Report o
Page 17 and 18:
hectares; bamboo (both natural and
Page 19 and 20:
internode length, height, girth, st
Page 21 and 22:
Seeds Availability of seed is limit
Page 23 and 24:
Oxytenanthera stocksii Pleoblastus
Page 25 and 26:
References Anon. 1997. Compendium o
Page 27 and 28:
inventory of harvestable volume and
Page 29 and 30:
Some climbing bamboos are presently
Page 31 and 32:
Research breakthroughs The pioneer
Page 33 and 34:
A = 20 mm C = 10 mm Scale: 1-10 mm
Page 35 and 36:
Abstract Integrated Management of B
Page 37 and 38:
In the other hand, guadua bamboo fo
Page 39 and 40:
For bamboo species, models for pred
Page 41 and 42:
showed higher coefficient of determ
Page 43 and 44:
30 cm above ground level and closel
Page 45 and 46:
. Cumls per clump 40 35 30 25 20 15
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 11. Capability of land for g
Page 49 and 50:
productivity (Camargo et al. 2007).
Page 51 and 52:
esidues (Deuchars et al. 1999). Soi
Page 53 and 54:
Conclusions and recommendations For
Page 55 and 56:
References Arbeláez, A.C. 1996. Re
Page 57 and 58:
Orrego, S.A. ,Del Valle, J.I. 2001.
Page 59 and 60:
shoot earlier in the winter. Hence,
Page 61 and 62:
Results and Discussion Effects of B
Page 63 and 64:
and Ald, Alp, Alo and AlT. However,
Page 65 and 66:
Panting time Table 1. Soil properti
Page 67 and 68:
Exchangeabl e Al ( mg kg -1 ) 300 2
Page 69 and 70:
Al cont ent ( mg/ kg) 3000 2500 200
Page 71 and 72:
aboveground and belowground competi
Page 73 and 74:
Shoot harvests represent a smaller
Page 75 and 76:
Culm thinning practice The intensit
Page 77 and 78:
the withholding of fertiliser reduc
Page 79 and 80: References Castaneda-Mendoza A.; Va
Page 81 and 82: Tree yield (t ha -1 ) 200 (a) 150 1
Page 83 and 84: Bamboo has called the poorperson’
Page 85 and 86: Department and Forest Survey of Ind
Page 87 and 88: Table 4. Total target under NBM in
Page 89 and 90: 1) Statistical information Fundamen
Page 91 and 92: Abstract Evaluation of Above Ground
Page 93 and 94: Table 1: Linear relationship betwee
Page 95 and 96: References Agarwal, A.; Khokhar, D.
Page 97 and 98: Fig 2. Bamboo Plantation at hill to
Page 99 and 100: in northern Sudan stretches from ea
Page 101 and 102: Culm Height Omjamena forest site re
Page 103 and 104: References Andrews, J. 1950. The fl
Page 105 and 106: Figure 2. The Studied Bamboo Forest
Page 107 and 108: Figure 1: A not maintained bamboo f
Page 109 and 110: amboo forests are not maintained. I
Page 111 and 112: NPO Kitakyushu Biotope Network Grou
Page 113 and 114: In the area around the Kitakyushu S
Page 115 and 116: Number of participants The bamboo f
Page 117 and 118: Abstract Performance of Exotic Bamb
Page 119 and 120: The trial sites of Kakamega and Mug
Page 121 and 122: determining culm weight is by physi
Page 123 and 124: Table 5: Performance of Cephalostac
Page 125 and 126: For instance, Table 12 shows that,
Page 127 and 128: Species to Site Matching Table 16:
Page 129: Table 18: General Ranking of Specie
Page 133 and 134: Table 22: Relative Yield Performanc
Page 135 and 136: Table 24: Species per Site - Benchm
Page 137 and 138: altitude but has excellent growing
Page 139 and 140: NEMA, (2004). State of the Environm
Page 141 and 142: Research Site and Method Research i
Page 143 and 144: Discussion As of the research in 19
Page 145 and 146: Table 2. Change of density and occu
Page 147 and 148: Figure 1. Distribution of diameter
Page 149: 2 Figure 3. Distribution of diamete
show all

WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?