08.06.2013 Views

WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 1: Linear relationship between above ground biomass of bamboo plant components (y<br />

Kg pole -1 ) <strong>and</strong> height (x1, m), girth to height at 1m (x2, m) & girth to height at 1.5m (x3, m).<br />

S.N. Biomass (Kg<br />

plant -1 )<br />

Intercept (a) Slope (b1) Slope<br />

(b2)<br />

Slope<br />

(b3)<br />

1 Fresh weight -1.30 0.463 -3.74 30.2 0.998<br />

2 Dry Weight -0.809 0.393 -6.68 18.43 0.976<br />

Above ground biomass produced by D. asper at two aspects varied. Biomass produced in two years after the<br />

plantation was 17 per cent higher at the hill top as compared to river bank on the fresh weight basis. Average<br />

biomass produced was 542.24 kg ha -1 <strong>and</strong> 450.06 kg ha -1 at ARS Majhera <strong>and</strong> Jarmila, respectively. Dry weight<br />

was recorded approximately 63 per cent less than the fresh weight (Table 2). Average biomass on the basis of<br />

dry weight was 208.43 kg ha -1 at ARS Majhera which was 19.8 per cent higher than Jarmila (166.99 kg ha -1 ).<br />

Table 2: Above ground biomass produced by D. asper at two aspects<br />

Average Biomass (Kg ha -1 S.N. Treatments<br />

)*<br />

ARS, Majhera<br />

Jarmila<br />

(Hill Top)<br />

(River bank)<br />

1 Fresh weight 542.24 450.06<br />

2 Dry weight 208.43 166.99<br />

* On the basis of one pole/plant<br />

Soil carbon concentration in both the aspects was estimated up to 20 cm depth. Soil carbon of the hill top was<br />

found higher than the soil carbon of river bank. Negative correlation was found between the per cent soil carbon<br />

<strong>and</strong> radial distance from the centre of the plant (Table 3). Per cent soil carbon increased by 64-70 at ARS<br />

Majhera <strong>and</strong> 32-60 at Jarmila due to litter deposition (leaf fall) as compared to control.<br />

Table 3: Soil carbon due to plantation of D. asper<br />

S.N. Radial distance from centre of Per cent Organic carbon<br />

plant ARS, Majhera<br />

Jarmila<br />

(Hill Top)<br />

(River bank)<br />

1 0.5 m 2.57 0.97<br />

2 1.0 m 2.15 0.58<br />

3 Control 0.78 0.39<br />

There are few studies on biomass production by D. asper. Mathematical regression models are commonly<br />

practiced in determining the biomass of forest all over the world because it does not damage the growth of the<br />

<strong>VIII</strong> World Bamboo Congress Proceedings Vol 4-92<br />

R 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!