WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 23: Species to Site - Benchmark Analysis and Relative Yield Performance Species to Site Analysis Based on Combined Benchmark Comparison and Site Performance Data Rank Species Site Benchmark Comparison Data H D WT DM Site Performance Data AC EY RYS 1 B. bambos Jilore 75% 75% 75% 37.9% 22 40.2 100% 2 " " Gede 45% 42% 42% 7.8% 25 9.4 23% 3 " " Kakamega 20% 58% 56% 6.5% 22 6.9 17% 4 " " Muguga 20% 50% 50% 5.0% 22 5.3 13% 1 B. tulda Kakamega 33% 70% 59% 13.9% 17 8.0 100% 2 " " Muguga 33% 70% 59% 13.9% 17 8.0 100% 1 B. vulgaris Kakamega 53% 100% 90% 48.3% 28 16.0 100% 2 " " Muguga 47% 100% 90% 42.3% 28 14.0 88% 3 " " Gede 53% 86% 80% 36.7% 30 13.0 81% 1 C. pergracile Muguga 56% 75% 83% 34.4% 17 5.9 100% 1 D. brandisii Kakamega 48% 92% 83% 36.9% 17 37.9 100% 2 " " Muguga 40% 83% 100% 32.8% 17 33.7 89% 3 " " Gede 60% 83% 100% 49.2% 6 17.8 47% 1 D. hamiltonii Muguga 45% 100% 67% 30.8% 28 29.0 100% 2 " " Kakamega 50% 100% 67% 34.2% 19 21.8 75% 3 " " Jilore 50% 60% 60% 18.0% 28 16.9 58% 4 " " Gede 45% 50% 50% 11.2% 30 11.3 39% 1 D. membranaceus Jilore 67% 70% 100% 45.6% 39 36.8 100% 2 " " Kakamega 39% 70% 80% 21.6% 17 7.6 21% 3 " " Gede 50% 50% 50% 12.5% 28 7.2 20% 4 " " Muguga 39% 60% 60% 14.0% 17 4.9 13% 1 D. strictus Kakamega 50% 88% 83% 36.8% 11 9.6 100% 2 " " Muguga 50% 75% 77% 28.6% 11 7.4 78% 3 " " Gede 90% 38% 38% 12.7% 25 7.5 78% 1 T. siamensis Muguga 56% 75% 60% 45.6% 28 6.8 100% 2 " " Gede 67% 63% 63% 26.1% 39 5.4 80% 3 " " Kakamega 56% 63% 60% 21.1% 28 3.1 11% VIII World Bamboo Congress Proceedings Vol 4-133
Table 24: Species per Site - Benchmark Analysis and Relative Yield Performance Ranking of Species per Site Based on Combined Benchmark Comparison and Site Performance Data Rank Site Species Benchmark Comparison Data H D WT DM Site Performance Data AC EY RYS 1 Gede B. vulgaris 53% 86% 80% 37% 30 13.0 81% 2 " " T. siamensis 67% 63% 63% 26% 39 5.4 80% 3 " " D. brandisii 60% 83% 100% 49% 6 17.8 47% 4 " " D. strictus 90% 38% 38% 13% 25 7.5 78% 5 " " D. hamiltonii 45% 50% 50% 11% 30 11.3 39% 6 " " D. membranaceus 50% 50% 50% 12% 28 7.2 20% 7 " " B. bambos 45% 42% 42% 8% 25 9.4 23% 1 Jilore D. membranaceus 67% 70% 100% 46% 39 36.8 100% 2 " " B. bambos 75% 75% 75% 38% 22 40.2 100% 3 " " D. hamiltonii 50% 60% 60% 18% 28 16.9 58% 1 Kakamega B. vulgaris 53% 100% 90% 48% 28 16.0 100% 2 " " D. brandisii 48% 92% 83% 37% 17 37.9 100% 3 " " D. strictus 50% 88% 83% 37% 11 9.6 100% 4 " " B. tulda 33% 70% 59% 14% 17 8.0 100% 5 " " D. hamiltonii 50% 100% 67% 34% 19 21.8 75% 6 " " D. membranaceus 39% 70% 80% 22% 17 7.6 21% 7 " " T. siamensis 56% 63% 60% 21% 28 3.1 11% 8 " " B. bambos 20% 58% 56% 7% 22 6.9 17% 1 Muguga T. siamensis 56% 75% 60% 46% 28 6.8 100% 2 " " C. pergracile 56% 75% 83% 34% 17 5.9 100% 3 " " D. hamiltonii 45% 100% 67% 31% 28 29.0 100% 4 " " B. vulgaris 47% 100% 90% 42% 28 14.0 88% 5 " " D. brandisii 40% 83% 100% 33% 17 33.7 89% 6 " " B. tulda 33% 70% 59% 14% 17 8.0 100% 7 " " D. strictus 50% 75% 77% 29% 11 7.4 78% 8 " " D. membranaceus 39% 60% 60% 14% 17 4.9 13% 9 " " B. bambos 20% 50% 50% 5% 22 5.3 13% Conclusion The comparative analysis of each species per site benchmarked to the performance of the species in their natural range is one criterion for species to site matching. In addition it is useful to compare the relative performance of species in the various trials by considering the number of culms per clump and estimated potential yield of the species per hectare. Table 31 shows the species to site matching for Kakamega. The overall performance ranking is based on an analysis of the various criteria of each species as shown in Table 18 to Table 30. Table 31 shows for instance, VIII World Bamboo Congress Proceedings Vol 4-134
Page 1 and 2:
VOLUME 4 Resources - Forestry, Plan
Page 3 and 4:
Planning, Designing and Implementin
Page 5 and 6:
As indicated earlier, the major ind
Page 7 and 8:
Soil : Most bamboos are found in sa
Page 9 and 10:
Financial aspects: Unit cost- The u
Page 11 and 12:
Repayment period The bank loan was
Page 13 and 14:
promoting new bamboo projects throu
Page 15 and 16:
Planning Commission, 2003. Report o
Page 17 and 18:
hectares; bamboo (both natural and
Page 19 and 20:
internode length, height, girth, st
Page 21 and 22:
Seeds Availability of seed is limit
Page 23 and 24:
Oxytenanthera stocksii Pleoblastus
Page 25 and 26:
References Anon. 1997. Compendium o
Page 27 and 28:
inventory of harvestable volume and
Page 29 and 30:
Some climbing bamboos are presently
Page 31 and 32:
Research breakthroughs The pioneer
Page 33 and 34:
A = 20 mm C = 10 mm Scale: 1-10 mm
Page 35 and 36:
Abstract Integrated Management of B
Page 37 and 38:
In the other hand, guadua bamboo fo
Page 39 and 40:
For bamboo species, models for pred
Page 41 and 42:
showed higher coefficient of determ
Page 43 and 44:
30 cm above ground level and closel
Page 45 and 46:
. Cumls per clump 40 35 30 25 20 15
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 11. Capability of land for g
Page 49 and 50:
productivity (Camargo et al. 2007).
Page 51 and 52:
esidues (Deuchars et al. 1999). Soi
Page 53 and 54:
Conclusions and recommendations For
Page 55 and 56:
References Arbeláez, A.C. 1996. Re
Page 57 and 58:
Orrego, S.A. ,Del Valle, J.I. 2001.
Page 59 and 60:
shoot earlier in the winter. Hence,
Page 61 and 62:
Results and Discussion Effects of B
Page 63 and 64:
and Ald, Alp, Alo and AlT. However,
Page 65 and 66:
Panting time Table 1. Soil properti
Page 67 and 68:
Exchangeabl e Al ( mg kg -1 ) 300 2
Page 69 and 70:
Al cont ent ( mg/ kg) 3000 2500 200
Page 71 and 72:
aboveground and belowground competi
Page 73 and 74:
Shoot harvests represent a smaller
Page 75 and 76:
Culm thinning practice The intensit
Page 77 and 78:
the withholding of fertiliser reduc
Page 79 and 80:
References Castaneda-Mendoza A.; Va
Page 81 and 82:
Tree yield (t ha -1 ) 200 (a) 150 1
Page 83 and 84: Bamboo has called the poorperson’
Page 85 and 86: Department and Forest Survey of Ind
Page 87 and 88: Table 4. Total target under NBM in
Page 89 and 90: 1) Statistical information Fundamen
Page 91 and 92: Abstract Evaluation of Above Ground
Page 93 and 94: Table 1: Linear relationship betwee
Page 95 and 96: References Agarwal, A.; Khokhar, D.
Page 97 and 98: Fig 2. Bamboo Plantation at hill to
Page 99 and 100: in northern Sudan stretches from ea
Page 101 and 102: Culm Height Omjamena forest site re
Page 103 and 104: References Andrews, J. 1950. The fl
Page 105 and 106: Figure 2. The Studied Bamboo Forest
Page 107 and 108: Figure 1: A not maintained bamboo f
Page 109 and 110: amboo forests are not maintained. I
Page 111 and 112: NPO Kitakyushu Biotope Network Grou
Page 113 and 114: In the area around the Kitakyushu S
Page 115 and 116: Number of participants The bamboo f
Page 117 and 118: Abstract Performance of Exotic Bamb
Page 119 and 120: The trial sites of Kakamega and Mug
Page 121 and 122: determining culm weight is by physi
Page 123 and 124: Table 5: Performance of Cephalostac
Page 125 and 126: For instance, Table 12 shows that,
Page 127 and 128: Species to Site Matching Table 16:
Page 129 and 130: Table 18: General Ranking of Specie
Page 131 and 132: Table 20: General Ranking of Specie
Page 133: Table 22: Relative Yield Performanc
Page 137 and 138: altitude but has excellent growing
Page 139 and 140: NEMA, (2004). State of the Environm
Page 141 and 142: Research Site and Method Research i
Page 143 and 144: Discussion As of the research in 19
Page 145 and 146: Table 2. Change of density and occu
Page 147 and 148: Figure 1. Distribution of diameter
Page 149: 2 Figure 3. Distribution of diamete
show all

WBC-VIII-Vol.4 – Resources – Forestry, Plantations and ... - BambuSC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?