Crossroads: The Psychology of Immigration in the New Century
Crossroads: The Psychology of Immigration in the New Century
Crossroads: The Psychology of Immigration in the New Century
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and traditional mental health sett<strong>in</strong>gs. However, given <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number <strong>of</strong> contacts that a significant number <strong>of</strong><br />
immigrants are likely to have with such <strong>in</strong>stitutions as law<br />
enforcement, <strong>the</strong> judiciary system, and immigration services<br />
(i.e., <strong>Immigration</strong> and Customs Enforcement), it behooves<br />
us to address assessment issues and challenges that exist <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>se sett<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Intervention<br />
<strong>The</strong> present state <strong>of</strong> knowledge concern<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice<br />
suggests that to provide <strong>the</strong> most effective mental health<br />
services to immigrants, cl<strong>in</strong>icians should apply <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
guid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples:<br />
• Use an ecological perspective (Bronfenbrenner &<br />
Morris, 2006) to develop and guide <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />
• Integrate evidence-based practice with practice-based<br />
evidence.<br />
• Provide culturally competent treatment.<br />
• Use comprehensive community-based services.<br />
• Use a social justice perspective as a driv<strong>in</strong>g force for all<br />
services.<br />
While <strong>the</strong>se pr<strong>in</strong>ciples are referenced throughout <strong>the</strong> report,<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are presented here <strong>in</strong> more detail to underscore <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
importance <strong>in</strong> guid<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ical <strong>in</strong>terventions.<br />
Ecological Framework<br />
In l<strong>in</strong>e with one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g perspectives <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong><br />
this report and with recommendations put forth by various<br />
multicultural psychologists (e.g., Casas et al., 2008), it is<br />
recommended that cl<strong>in</strong>icians give serious consideration<br />
to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> an ecological framework (Bronfenbrenner<br />
& Morris, 2006). As previously noted <strong>in</strong> this report (see<br />
<strong>the</strong> Introduction), such a framework is based on <strong>the</strong><br />
belief that <strong>the</strong> human experience is a result <strong>of</strong> reciprocal<br />
<strong>in</strong>teractions between <strong>in</strong>dividuals and <strong>the</strong>ir environments,<br />
vary<strong>in</strong>g as a function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual, his or her contexts<br />
and culture, and time. Each context <strong>of</strong>fers particular risks<br />
as well as protective factors that ei<strong>the</strong>r detract from or<br />
enhance healthy adaptation. <strong>The</strong>y need to be understood<br />
<strong>in</strong> fram<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> immigrant experience and considered <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> development and implementation <strong>of</strong> mental health<br />
treatments.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g this framework, a cl<strong>in</strong>ician should ga<strong>the</strong>r relevant<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation from <strong>the</strong> five systems that subsume <strong>the</strong> client’s<br />
contexts and culture (i.e., <strong>the</strong> micro-, meso-, exo-, macro-<br />
and chronosystems) (see <strong>the</strong> Introduction). As noted <strong>in</strong><br />
Resilience and Recovery After War: Refugee Children and Families<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States (APA, 2010c, p. 4), <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation that<br />
should be ga<strong>the</strong>red to <strong>in</strong>form <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong>cludes effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> migration (before, dur<strong>in</strong>g, and after), legal/documentation<br />
status, acculturation, risk and resilience, cultural and religious<br />
beliefs, age <strong>of</strong> migration/developmental stage, race, ethnicity,<br />
gender, social class, sexual orientation, disability/ability,<br />
experiences <strong>of</strong> racism and discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, language and<br />
educational barriers, and access to services and resources.<br />
This <strong>in</strong>formation is <strong>of</strong>ten critical to develop<strong>in</strong>g a complex<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual’s experiences <strong>of</strong> distress.<br />
Evidence-Based Practice and Practice-Based Evidence<br />
An important dialectic <strong>in</strong> mental health <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />
research <strong>in</strong>volves evidence-based practice and practice-based<br />
evidence. Evidence-based practice <strong>in</strong> psychology (EBPP)<br />
is <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best available research with cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
expertise. <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> EBPP is to promote effective<br />
psychological practice and enhance public health by<br />
apply<strong>in</strong>g empirically supported pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> psychological<br />
assessment, case formulation, <strong>the</strong>rapeutic relationship, and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervention (Kazd<strong>in</strong>, 2008).<br />
Evidence-based practice approaches psychological treatment<br />
with <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristics and<br />
sociocultural context both play important roles <strong>in</strong> assessment<br />
and <strong>in</strong>tervention (La Roche & Christopher, 2009; Sackett,<br />
Straus, Richardson, Rosenberg, & Haynes, 2000). <strong>The</strong>re<br />
has been grow<strong>in</strong>g discussion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field about prioritiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
evidence-based treatments (EBTs) over practice-based<br />
adaptations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se treatments or practice approaches<br />
judged appropriate by cl<strong>in</strong>icians but not empirically tested<br />
<strong>in</strong> randomized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials.<br />
Efficacy research that identifies EBTs <strong>in</strong>corporates<br />
randomized controlled trials and focuses specifically on<br />
outcomes that result from care provided by well-tra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
mental health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. To make causal <strong>in</strong>ferences<br />
about <strong>in</strong>tervention effectiveness, randomized cl<strong>in</strong>ical trials<br />
use tightly controlled designs, carefully select <strong>the</strong>ir client<br />
populations, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> strict fidelity to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />
model, and use well-tra<strong>in</strong>ed mental health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>icient <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> service model be<strong>in</strong>g tested (La Roche<br />
& Christopher, 2009). But many such studies have been<br />
68 Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> APA Presidential Task Force on <strong>Immigration</strong>