30.06.2013 Views

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Empirical Analysis: Cointegration Models, Structural Breaks and Policy Reform<br />

[ β β hrw β reg1<br />

β reg2<br />

β reg2hrw<br />

β reg3<br />

β t1<br />

β t2<br />

β u ]<br />

swfrt 0 1 t 2 t 3 t 4<br />

t 5 t 6 t 7 t 8<br />

t<br />

(6.3)<br />

As explained in chapter 3, all these factors are expected to have lowered the<br />

French prices with respect to the US ones, that is, β6, β7, β8 > 0, without having a<br />

direct impact on price transmission elasticities. Estimates are reported in table 6.5.<br />

α<br />

Table 6.5 VECM with structural breaks: EU and WTO policy regimes, export taxes,<br />

2001/02 campaign<br />

∆swfr t-1<br />

∆swfr t-2<br />

∆swfr t-3<br />

∆swfr t-4<br />

∆hrw t-1<br />

∆hrw t-2<br />

∆hrw t-3<br />

∆hrw t-4<br />

∆swfrt ∆hrwt Cointegration vector<br />

-0.066***<br />

(0.010)<br />

0.012<br />

(0.040) β0 -3.810***<br />

(0.367)<br />

-0.175***<br />

(0.060)<br />

0.297<br />

(0.227) β1 -0.257***<br />

(0.074)<br />

0.231***<br />

(0.060)<br />

0.282<br />

(0.228) β2 0.164**<br />

(0.045)<br />

0.256***<br />

(0.060)<br />

-0.488**<br />

(0.228) β3 -0.664<br />

(1.061)<br />

0.197***<br />

(0.062)<br />

0.147<br />

(0.235) β4 0.170<br />

(0.218)<br />

0.031*<br />

(0.017)<br />

0.324***<br />

(0.066) β5 -0.236***<br />

(0.074)<br />

-0.055***<br />

(0.018)<br />

-0.118*<br />

(0.069) β6 -0.013<br />

(0.100)<br />

0.008<br />

(0.018)<br />

0.062<br />

(0.069) β7 -0.179*<br />

(0.118)<br />

-0.079***<br />

(0.018)<br />

0.0002<br />

(0.068) β8 0.372***<br />

(0.082)<br />

LM 1.161 (p-value 0.296) 0.547 (p-value 0.932) β1 + β4 = -1 χ2 = 9.213 (p-value 0.002)<br />

ARCH (5) 24.667(p-value .0002) 11.540 (p-value 0.042)<br />

β 2,β3, β4, β5, β6, β7, β8 = 0<br />

χ2 = 34.668 (p-value 0)<br />

SBIC -7.404 HQN -8.301<br />

Standard errors in parenthesis. *significant at 10%; **significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% for the null<br />

hypothesis of zero coefficients<br />

LM: LM test with null hypothesis of no-autocorrelation up to the 18 th lag. ARCH(5): LM test with the null<br />

hypothesis of no ARCH effects up to the 5 th lag. SBIC : Schwartz's Bayesian Information criterion. HQN:<br />

Hannan-Quinn Information criterion<br />

The autocorrelation in the French equation has been removed. This time, even<br />

if both the French and the US adjustment coefficients have the expected sign, the<br />

US one is not significant, which may suggest its weak exogeneity. In the<br />

cointegration vector, although β0, β1 and β2 have very similar values to those<br />

reported in table 6.4 where the additional factors were not considered, β4, β6 and<br />

β7 have not the expected sign. For the latter two, this might well depend on the<br />

short number of observations available for these specific regimes, since export<br />

taxes were imposed for a very few months. Instead, β8 > 0 as expected; moreover,<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!