30.06.2013 Views

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Soft Wheat Markets Under Policy Intervention<br />

1995, and the following implementation of the URAA, the first multilateral<br />

agreement explicitly referred to agriculture.<br />

The URAA regulates both domestic support and export subsidies. For the first,<br />

the EU always kept a safe margin with respect to the maximum ceilings allowed<br />

for distorsive support; for the latter, the limits established for wheat were never<br />

binding for the EU (Anania 2007b).<br />

As far as market access is concerned, the URAA abolished the possibility of<br />

keeping threshold prices and variable levies; with the “tariffication”, all border<br />

measures were converted into import duties to be lowered in the following six<br />

years 45 . The EU has then consolidated the duties for cereals under the General<br />

Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) agreement.<br />

However, some modifications were introduced in the so-called Blair House<br />

Agreement between the EU and the US. Due to the high levels of protections in<br />

the reference period chosen for the tariffication (the years 1986-1988), with regard<br />

to the main cereals, the tariff equivalents notified at the WTO were so high that a<br />

system for restricting duties was deemed necessary for the EU, in order to put a<br />

ceiling on the import entry price. The import entry price was then capped at 155%<br />

of the intervention price, if the sum of the duties would make it go above this<br />

threshold. The entry price turned out to be almost always capped, thus eliminating<br />

any real difference between the old variable levy system and the new one (see<br />

table 4.1)<br />

62<br />

Table 4.1 Elements for calculating the duty on cereals<br />

Import duty = 155% intervention price – cif reference price<br />

cif reference price = average US quotation for the reference variety during the receding two weeks<br />

+ Gulf premium or Great Lakes premium*<br />

+ Gulf Rotterdam or Great Lakes-Rotterdam freight premium*<br />

Intervention price = price in force including monthly increases at the time the duty is applied.<br />

There are five different wheat categories for which import duties are established. For all of these categories a<br />

US price is used to calculate the reference price. The duties are set every two weeks.<br />

*The first freight premium corresponds to the cost of freight across the United States to the Gulf (“Gulf<br />

premium”) if the commodity is quoted in Chicago or Kansas City, or to the Great Lakes (“Great Lakes”<br />

premium) if the commodity is quoted in Minneapolis. The second freight premium corresponds to freight<br />

from the United States (Gulf or Great Lakes) to the port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands. The day’s exchange<br />

rate is used for conversion.<br />

Source: Gallezot 2007, p.16<br />

45 The reduction agreed was 36%, with a minimum reduction of 15% for each “8 digit” product of the<br />

Harmonized System codification; for agriculture, customs duties are for the most part specific duties, i.e.,<br />

expressed in euro/t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!