30.06.2013 Views

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annexes<br />

METHODOLOGY DATA USED MAJOR FINDINGS<br />

DYNAMIC REGRESSION MODELS BASED ON A POINT LOCATION MODEL: COINTEGRATION<br />

Dawson and Sanjuan and White, 2006<br />

They apply Johansen’s procedure<br />

allowing for structural breaks. The<br />

time of occurrence of the structural<br />

break is known. Co-movement<br />

between futures prices can arise when<br />

commodities are substitutes. They<br />

investigate the relation between feed<br />

barley and wheat prices on the London<br />

International Financial Futures<br />

Exchange.<br />

Dawson and Sanjuan, 2006<br />

They apply Johansen’s procedure<br />

allowing for structural breaks to<br />

investigate the dynamics of North<br />

America wheat markets and verify the<br />

effects of the Export Enhancement<br />

Program. The time of occurrence of<br />

the structural break is known.<br />

Dercon and Campenhout, 1999<br />

They apply a threshold error<br />

correction model, the Band-TAR<br />

model. Such a model, like switching<br />

regime models (they explicitly refer to<br />

Baulch’s parity bound model), allows<br />

for trade discontinuities and trade flow<br />

reversals, but uses more reasonable<br />

distributional assumptions and is<br />

dynamic, explicitly considering the<br />

process of arbitrage in the form of<br />

non-linear correction.<br />

130<br />

London International Financial<br />

Futures Exchange weekly data<br />

for feed wheat and barley future<br />

prices (in logs).<br />

1996-2002<br />

Monthly fob prices (in logs):<br />

Canadian Western Red Spring,<br />

US Dark Northern Spring.<br />

January 1974-December2001.<br />

Same as Baulch, (1997).<br />

They find a significant break<br />

in October 2000 (due to<br />

Common Agricultural Policy<br />

intervention price reductions<br />

and poor sowing conditions).<br />

The barley–wheat futures<br />

market is perfectly<br />

integrated; the barley price<br />

Granger-causes the wheat<br />

price. Modelling structural<br />

breaks in price relationships<br />

appears of big importance.<br />

They find that cointegration<br />

exists and that there are two<br />

structural breaks<br />

corresponding to the<br />

beginning and the end of the<br />

US Export Enhancement<br />

Programme. The EEP has<br />

caused the US/Canada price<br />

ratio to fall.<br />

They find that in most<br />

markets full arbitrage is<br />

achieved with trade taking<br />

place; but, differently from<br />

Baulch, that in others<br />

arbitrage is slow and rather<br />

inefficient. This might be<br />

due to imperfect competition.<br />

This is explained by the fact<br />

that, in Baulch’s model, even<br />

in the efficient arbitrage<br />

regime, the transfer costs are<br />

assumed to be measured with<br />

errors (but dynamic<br />

properties of the errors are<br />

not considered), whereas<br />

here the price margin is<br />

taken as such. On the other<br />

side, they probably<br />

overestimate the times in<br />

which the efficient arbitrage<br />

condition is violated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!