TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Empirical Analysis: Cointegration Models Accounting for Policy Regime Changes<br />
the intervention and the US price). Finally, both adjustment coefficients and the<br />
cointegrating vector parameters are assumed to vary.<br />
The cointegration models presented, though over-simplified, represent an<br />
attempt of combining policy and price data. To the author’s knowledge, so far no<br />
such attempts have been made.<br />
The “composite variable” model, Model 1, is presented in paragraph 5.2.1;<br />
whereas the other empirical models, Model 2, Model 3 and Model 4, are presented<br />
in paragraph 5.2.2.<br />
5.2.1 Model 1: the use of a composite variable<br />
As anticipated, to take into account the role played by EU policies for soft<br />
wheat, some alternative schemes can be proposed.<br />
The first one is the creation of a composite variable, the “EU external reference<br />
price” (wreft). Indeed, assuming that the fundamental target of the EU price policy<br />
is to keep at least the intervention price level in the internal market, each month<br />
the “EU external reference price” is calculated as the maximum between the<br />
intervention price and the US (world) price; wreft = max (hrwt,pintt).<br />
What is argued is that the EU price follows the US price, when it is above the<br />
intervention price, and vice versa. The intervention price acts as an implicit<br />
downward threshold for the US price.<br />
In this paragraph, the empirical study will be carried out both on the whole<br />
sample (301 observations, 1978:12 to 2003:12), and on two sub-samples,<br />
determined on the basis of the policy considerations made in the previous chapter,<br />
as described in table 5.1 63 .<br />
Table 5.1 The two sub-samples used in the cointegration analysis<br />
1978:12- 1993:06 175 observations<br />
1993:07- 2003:12 126 observations<br />
Precedent to substantial CAP reform<br />
(Regular CMO functioning, first reforms of 1988)<br />
Following substantial CAP reform<br />
(Mac Sharry reform, Agenda 2000, Fischler reform)<br />
Indeed, the MacSharry reform of 1993 represents the first fundamental change<br />
in the CAP of the EU, since, for the first time, substantial cuts of the intervention<br />
prices (-30%) were implemented. In fact, as expected, the US price tends to be<br />
63 Considering the limited power of unit roots and cointegration tests, it was not deemed appropriate to split<br />
the whole sample into the four sub-samples described in paragraph 4.2.2. For this reason, and considering its<br />
political relevance, the MacSharry reform has been chosen as the fundamental break.<br />
77