30.06.2013 Views

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Empirical Analysis: Cointegration Models Accounting for Policy Regime Changes<br />

the intervention and the US price). Finally, both adjustment coefficients and the<br />

cointegrating vector parameters are assumed to vary.<br />

The cointegration models presented, though over-simplified, represent an<br />

attempt of combining policy and price data. To the author’s knowledge, so far no<br />

such attempts have been made.<br />

The “composite variable” model, Model 1, is presented in paragraph 5.2.1;<br />

whereas the other empirical models, Model 2, Model 3 and Model 4, are presented<br />

in paragraph 5.2.2.<br />

5.2.1 Model 1: the use of a composite variable<br />

As anticipated, to take into account the role played by EU policies for soft<br />

wheat, some alternative schemes can be proposed.<br />

The first one is the creation of a composite variable, the “EU external reference<br />

price” (wreft). Indeed, assuming that the fundamental target of the EU price policy<br />

is to keep at least the intervention price level in the internal market, each month<br />

the “EU external reference price” is calculated as the maximum between the<br />

intervention price and the US (world) price; wreft = max (hrwt,pintt).<br />

What is argued is that the EU price follows the US price, when it is above the<br />

intervention price, and vice versa. The intervention price acts as an implicit<br />

downward threshold for the US price.<br />

In this paragraph, the empirical study will be carried out both on the whole<br />

sample (301 observations, 1978:12 to 2003:12), and on two sub-samples,<br />

determined on the basis of the policy considerations made in the previous chapter,<br />

as described in table 5.1 63 .<br />

Table 5.1 The two sub-samples used in the cointegration analysis<br />

1978:12- 1993:06 175 observations<br />

1993:07- 2003:12 126 observations<br />

Precedent to substantial CAP reform<br />

(Regular CMO functioning, first reforms of 1988)<br />

Following substantial CAP reform<br />

(Mac Sharry reform, Agenda 2000, Fischler reform)<br />

Indeed, the MacSharry reform of 1993 represents the first fundamental change<br />

in the CAP of the EU, since, for the first time, substantial cuts of the intervention<br />

prices (-30%) were implemented. In fact, as expected, the US price tends to be<br />

63 Considering the limited power of unit roots and cointegration tests, it was not deemed appropriate to split<br />

the whole sample into the four sub-samples described in paragraph 4.2.2. For this reason, and considering its<br />

political relevance, the MacSharry reform has been chosen as the fundamental break.<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!