30.06.2013 Views

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Soft Wheat Markets Under Policy Intervention<br />

demand is much less concentrated than the export supply (USDA 2005, p.10; see<br />

figure 4.4).<br />

The EU is a major player, being amongst both the largest exporters and the<br />

largest importers; but to whom the “price leadership” on world wheat markets<br />

belongs is an open question, to which empirical works have given different<br />

answers. Amongst the five world major players (Argentina, Australia, Canada, the<br />

EU and the US), Mohanty et al. (1999) show that there is no distinct leader 39 .<br />

However, in this work, the US price will be assumed to be representative of the<br />

world one. This seems a reasonable assumption; since 1975-76, the US share of<br />

global exports has fluctuated between 25 and 45 percent of the world total (USDA<br />

2005, p.8; figure 4.2).<br />

50.000<br />

40.000<br />

30.000<br />

20.000<br />

10.000<br />

0<br />

1961<br />

1963<br />

1965<br />

1967<br />

Figure 4.1 World wheat exports (1000 tonnes)<br />

1969<br />

1971<br />

1973<br />

1975<br />

1977<br />

1979<br />

1981<br />

Source: Faostat 2007<br />

39 They find out that, while the US price is affected by the Canadian and the Australian prices only, the EU<br />

responds to US and Canadian changes but doesn’t have any influence on their prices. The EU responds to the<br />

US, but the reverse is not true. Previous studies (see Mohanty et al. 1999), some of which could be<br />

misspecified for not taking into account cointegration) get different results: some show that there is no<br />

significant leadership role between the US and Canada, while others find a strong leadership role for Canada<br />

for durum and Hard Red Spring markets. Goodwin and Schroeder (1991) find that both the US and Canada<br />

have a significant effect on the price of competing exporters but also that, while the US has an effect on<br />

Canada, the reverse is not true; they consider the US as a price leader in the international wheat market.<br />

Dawson and Sanjuan (2007) find that Canada is the price leader in the relation with the US price for hard<br />

wheats. In Ghoshray and Lyoid (2003) Canada is found to be the price leader in the North American market<br />

for hard wheat exports.<br />

1983<br />

1985<br />

Russian Federation Ukraine Argentina<br />

Australia Canada US<br />

EU<br />

1987<br />

1989<br />

1991<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

2005<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!