TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Empirical Analysis: Cointegration Models, Structural Breaks and Policy Reform<br />
show how the residuals from the overall cointegration relation have a constant<br />
which changes over time, in correspondence to structural breaks. In particular, the<br />
two series have a common patter up to 1993:06, after which the structural breaks<br />
are considered in the error correction term of the VECM estimated by allowing<br />
for a lower constant and an increased price transmission elasticity.<br />
Figure 6.1 Long run residuals of the VECM with structural breaks (EU and WTO policy<br />
regimes, 2001/02 campaign)<br />
0,8<br />
0,6<br />
0,4<br />
0,2<br />
0<br />
-0,2<br />
-0,4<br />
1978:12<br />
1980:12<br />
1982:12<br />
1984:12<br />
1986:12<br />
1988:12<br />
1990:12<br />
When cointegration is present, we expect IRFs not to always die out: their<br />
effect can be permanent, as the whole system will move to a new long run<br />
equilibrium. Both transitory and permanent shocks can be present (Goodwin et al.<br />
1999, p.168). To calculate orthogonal IRFs, the ordering of the Choleski<br />
decomposition for the VAR reformulated in levels is swfrt, hrwt. This means that,<br />
at time t, the French price depends on only one contemporaneous structural shock,<br />
whereas the US price depends on the two of them. We could interpret the first one<br />
as a shock occurring in the EU market, which affects contemporaneously both the<br />
French and the US price, and the second one as a shock happening on world<br />
markets, which at time t affects the US price only. In other words, we assume that<br />
the US price has no contemporaneous effects on the French price, but lagged<br />
values of the US price have an effect on the French price. The French price has,<br />
instead, a contemporaneous effect on the US one. We see that all IRFs, for a 12<br />
months time horizon, are generally low but different from zero (figure 6.2), with<br />
the exception of the French response to a shock in the US price. Both the French<br />
and the US price response to a shock in themselves tend to be persistent, whereas<br />
the response of each price to a shock in the other price is generally lower and<br />
1992:12<br />
1994:12<br />
1996:12<br />
1998:12<br />
EC 3<br />
residuals 3<br />
2000:12<br />
2002:12<br />
4,2<br />
4<br />
3,8<br />
3,6<br />
3,4<br />
3,2<br />
3<br />
105