TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Empirical Analysis: Cointegration Models Accounting for Policy Regime Changes<br />
α<br />
LM test<br />
ARCH(13)<br />
84<br />
Table 5.5 Model 1b estimates for swfr and hrw, 1993:07-2003:12<br />
∆swfr ∆hrw Cointegration vector<br />
-0.078**<br />
(0.034)<br />
0.452<br />
(p-value 0.963)<br />
16.849<br />
(p-value 0.206)<br />
0.063<br />
(0.060)<br />
0.221<br />
(p-value 0.999)<br />
17.552<br />
(p-value 0.175)<br />
swfr = 0.<br />
664+<br />
0.<br />
842*<br />
* * hrw<br />
t<br />
( 1.<br />
505)<br />
( 0.<br />
305)<br />
cost = 0 χ 2 = 0.136 (p-value 0.712)<br />
β hwr = 1 χ 2 = 0. 180 (p-value 0.672)<br />
β hwr = 0 χ 2 = 8.549 (p-value 0.003)<br />
Standard errors are reported in parenthesis<br />
LM test: Lagrange Multiplier test with the null hypothesis of no-autocorrelation<br />
*significant at 10%; **significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% for the null hypothesis of zero coefficients (#, ##<br />
and ### respectively if for βhrw the null hypothesis of equal to one is rejected)<br />
In Model 1b, the hypothesis of perfect price transmission in the cointegration<br />
vector is not rejected. Adjustments coefficients have the right sign. The US price<br />
performs as weakly exogenous.<br />
wref and swfr are cointegrated, as well 73 ; the corresponding VECM is<br />
estimated (Model 1b, table 5.6).<br />
α<br />
LM test<br />
ARCH(13)<br />
Table 5.6 Model 1b estimates for swfr and wref, 1993:07-2003:12<br />
∆swfr ∆wref Cointegration vector<br />
-0.073**<br />
(0.032)<br />
0.346<br />
(p-value 0.991)<br />
13.086<br />
(p-value 0.441)<br />
0.063<br />
(0.052)<br />
0.155<br />
(p-value 0.999)<br />
10.644<br />
(p-value 0.641)<br />
swfr = 0.<br />
072+<br />
0.<br />
990*<br />
* * wref<br />
t<br />
( 1.<br />
624)<br />
( 0.<br />
328)<br />
cost = 0 χ 2 = 0.001 (p-value 0.970)<br />
β wref = 1 χ 2 = 0.0006 (p-value 0.981)<br />
β wref = 0 χ 2 = 9.201 (p-value 0.002)<br />
Standard errors are reported in parenthesis<br />
LM test: Lagrange Multiplier test with the null hypothesis of no-autocorrelation<br />
*significant at 10%; **significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% for the null hypothesis of zero coefficients (#, ##<br />
and ### respectively if for βwref the null hypothesis of equal to one is rejected)<br />
The long run relationship is swfrt = 0.072+ 0.990wreft. Adjustment<br />
coefficients, that are very close to the one presented in table 5.5, have the<br />
expected sign. The wref one is not significant, which could suggest that it is<br />
73 The two series are not cointegrated when 2 lags are included (which is the optimum number of lags in all<br />
cases). When, in analogy with the models estimated in the overall sample and in the first subsample, 13 lags<br />
are included, evidence of cointegration emerges if the null hypothesis is rejected at 10% significance. See<br />
annex C. The insertion of the 3 summer dummies allowed to get better information criteria.<br />
t<br />
t