TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
TESTING INTERNATIONAL PRICE TRANSMISSION UNDER ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
1978:12<br />
International Soft Wheat Markets Under Policy Intervention<br />
Figure 4.8 Soft wheat French price, US HRW price, intervention price (euro/t)<br />
1980:12<br />
1982:12<br />
1984:12<br />
1986:12<br />
1988:12<br />
1990:12<br />
Source: Eurostat, International Grains Council, European Commission regulations<br />
The three price series have quite a different behaviour. The US price presents a<br />
cyclical pattern, which is quite common for agricultural commodities, and is<br />
mostly due to the inherent characters of agricultural production (Hallett 1968).<br />
The French price appears to track closely the intervention one up to 1992,<br />
when its fluctuations seem to follow more the ones of the US price.<br />
What emerges even from this simple visual inspection, is that the MacSharry<br />
reform clearly marks a turning point in the behaviour of the series. The<br />
intervention price values were constantly set at higher levels during the 1980s and<br />
up to 1992 when, in correspondence to the implementation of the MacSharry<br />
reform, a 30% reduction of their level was agreed (we can notice their strong<br />
seasonality, as seasonal adjustments are established monthly to cover the increase<br />
in storage costs; figure 4.8). Indeed, intervention prices switch from being<br />
constantly above to constantly below the world ones.<br />
The French price is assumed to be the representative EU price, considering the<br />
fact that France is the biggest European wheat producer (Eurostat). In figure 4.9,<br />
moreover, we can see how the European prices from the four major agricultural<br />
producer countries move together over the past 30 years 61 ; once again, we can<br />
notice how, during the eighties, high intervention prices allowed to keep high the<br />
prices in the European markets.<br />
61 As far as Italy and France (amongst the most important EU countries in this respect) are concerned, Verga<br />
and Zuppiroli (2003, p.27) find out that the strong relationships existing between them are not affected by the<br />
MacSharry Reform, which would imply that, besides sharing the same political context, the two countries are<br />
tied by strong commercial linkages. It must be said that older studies (Zanias 1993; Gjolberg et al. 1996) find<br />
evidence of non-integrated wheat markets, unless prices are corrected by Monetary Compensatory Amounts,<br />
which operated as export subsidies/taxes in the intra-EU trade as the “green exchange rate” was fixed and<br />
might diverge from the actual market exchange rate.<br />
1992:12<br />
1994:12<br />
1996:12<br />
1998:12<br />
2000:12<br />
2002:12<br />
swfr<br />
hrw<br />
pint<br />
69