View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Baughn, C. C., Denekamp, J. G., Stevens, J. H., & Osborn, R. N. (1997). Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. Journal of World Business, 32(2), 103- 117. Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., & Huemer, L. (2008). Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 691-713. Bell, G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955-972. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the national basketball association. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 13-31. Brown, M. (2008). Soccer: SPARC help for NZF comes with conditions. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved June 1 2008, from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/category/story.cfm?c_id=86&objectid=10496998 Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business research methods. New York: Oxford University Press. Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24, 29-39. Carey, J., Morgan, M., & Oxtoby, M. (1996). Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 8(3), 1-5. Century City Developments. (2007). Century City Developments and Century City Football: Press release. Retrieved 21 February 2008, from http://www.centurycity.co.nz/press_release.html Chen, C.-J. (2004). The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management, 34(3), 311- 321. Coffey, J., & Wood, B. (2007). The kiwis: 100 years of international rugby league: Hodder Moa. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D., A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128- 152. Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (1988). Cooperative strategies in international business Massachusetts: Lexington Books. 112
Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (2002). Cooperative strategies and alliances. United Kingdom: Elsevier Science. Cousens, L., Babiak, K., & Bradish, C. L. (2006). Beyond sponsorship: Re-framing corporate-sport relationships. Sport Management Review, 9(1), 1-23 Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of English Technology Management, 20, 39-68. Darby, M. (2006). Alliance brand: Fulfilling the promise of partnering. Chichester, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organizational Science, 11(1), 77- 101. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2002). The dynamics of alliance conditions in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 725-746. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organizational Studies, 14(3), 375-394. Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 55- 83. Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. Dyer, W.G., Jr., & Wilkins, A.L. (1991). Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613–619. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Sang, E. W. K. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677-690. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Santos, F. M. (2002). Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy? In H. Thomas, A. M. Pettigrew & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management: London: Sage. Fahy, J. (2000). The resource-based view of the firm: Some stumbling-blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(2-4), 94-104. 113
Page 1 and 2:
Determinants of Inter-Partner Learn
Page 3 and 4:
3.3 Data Sources...................
Page 5 and 6:
INDEX OF FIGURES Figure 1: Case Stu
Page 7 and 8:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to of
Page 9 and 10:
DEDICATION I would like to dedicate
Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Backgrou
Page 13 and 14:
Harvey, 1997). However, the study o
Page 15 and 16:
take over management of the Knights
Page 17 and 18:
“to be New Zealand’s leading pa
Page 19 and 20:
transparency and receptivity to lea
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Int
Page 23 and 24:
To summarise this section, transfer
Page 25 and 26:
separated into internal and externa
Page 27 and 28:
least some form face-to-face contac
Page 29 and 30:
experiences with a view to improvin
Page 31 and 32:
are amongst the most important fact
Page 33 and 34:
Whether learning becomes self-susta
Page 35 and 36:
alliance. Organisations with a pref
Page 37 and 38:
uncontrolled access. Organisations
Page 39 and 40:
additional factor influencing recep
Page 41 and 42:
The rationale for this research was
Page 43 and 44:
the organisation and the relationsh
Page 45 and 46:
By keeping accounts of the research
Page 47 and 48:
number of questions where developed
Page 49 and 50:
interviews. Not only was there the
Page 51 and 52:
The next section focussed on the se
Page 53 and 54:
the opportunity to archive the data
Page 55 and 56:
3.4.4 Communication A major factor
Page 57 and 58:
three determinants of learning deve
Page 59 and 60:
the type of organisation but not th
Page 61 and 62:
CHAPTER 4 FINDINGS 4.1. Introductio
Page 63 and 64:
een one of the factors that had res
Page 65 and 66:
Interestingly NSO3 made this commen
Page 67 and 68:
some duplication, then, there’s c
Page 69 and 70:
[I]t’s mainly the management, but
Page 71 and 72: Other participants supported this b
Page 73 and 74: [the sport] in the country. And tha
Page 75 and 76: communication, April 18, 2008). Thi
Page 77 and 78: [W]e’ll come back from the intern
Page 79 and 80: [PSF1], and [PSF2] and ... the owne
Page 81 and 82: When probed further as to why this
Page 83 and 84: In certain areas the NSO1 thought i
Page 85 and 86: However in an unusual move, likely
Page 87 and 88: Since I’ve come on board, and cer
Page 89 and 90: obviously doing it. So on that leve
Page 91 and 92: PSF6 also reiterated this, wanting
Page 93 and 94: with them, you never know what you
Page 95 and 96: the answer: I think as I said, we
Page 97 and 98: access....so, in return for univers
Page 99 and 100: important.....we’re opening up ou
Page 101 and 102: It was clear that there had been so
Page 103 and 104: When questioned about who was the t
Page 105 and 106: We have three full time coaches her
Page 107 and 108: wanting to know more, I guess, yes,
Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 5.1 Introducti
Page 111 and 112: Both organisations are collaboratin
Page 113 and 114: Hamel’s (1991) study that argued
Page 115 and 116: financial issues. However one parti
Page 117 and 118: 5.4 Receptivity of Organisations in
Page 119 and 120: 5.5 Future Research There are a num
Page 121: REFERENCES Alexander, T., Thibault,
Page 125 and 126: Inkpen, A. C. (2002). Learning, kno
Page 127 and 128: New Zealand Companies Office. (2008
Page 129 and 130: Tsang, E. W. K., & Kwan, K.-M. (199
Page 131 and 132: Area Research Question Appendix 1:
Page 133 and 134: Appendix 2: AUTEC Ethical Approval
Page 135 and 136: Appendix 3: Participant Information
Page 137 and 138: How do I agree to participate in th
Page 139 and 140: Appendix 4: Participant Consent For
show all

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?