View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
important.....we’re opening up ourselves to them. So for them to come into our<br />
programme, obviously we’re definitely open to them. (personal communication,<br />
April 14, 2008)<br />
PSF3 made clear that “we don’t have any problems sharing what we do” (personal<br />
communication, April 16, 2008). Further the partnership document was an example of their<br />
willingness to share with the PSF “obviously, yes, that’s what the partnership agreement is<br />
about” (personal communication, April 16, 2008). PSF6 provided this example on what the<br />
PSF was willing to share with the NSO:<br />
Absolutely, I mean my example before of the video library. I mean, we’ve<br />
assembled all of this stuff, it’s in here, we’re quite happy to, we’ve got medical staff,<br />
we’ve got all sorts of things, so I mean, but I mean we’re just trying to do all of that,<br />
formalise so that we’ve fronted up with a hell of a pile of money to do what we’ve<br />
done, and we don’t believe that [the NSO] should get it for nothing, there’s a cost<br />
involved, it will be an absolute mates rate cost, but they can help us and we can help<br />
them. (personal communication, May 26, 2008)<br />
When talking about the PSFs willingness to share reports with the NSO, they felt<br />
that the NSO had never requested any. PSF4 elaborated:<br />
I haven’t, personally me, I haven’t given them any reports, but if they were for<br />
instance to come to me and say, hey we’re interested in your TV numbers this past<br />
season, do you have those figures? Sure, I’d give those to them.... so far they have<br />
not asked me for any information or reports, but I would be willing to share with<br />
them, absolutely. (personal communication, April 24, 2008)<br />
However if they were asked for any information they would surely provide it. PSF2<br />
said “but we’ve never really got to the stage where someone’s actually needed a report”<br />
(personal communication, April 14, 2008). When questioned, it was clear that ideas were<br />
being shared PSF5 said “[we] certainly share ideas and vision and things that we think<br />
would be good for the game” (personal communication, April 24, 2008).<br />
PSF3 again linked this willingness to the partnership document:<br />
All these things that we’re talking about, this partnership thing is about that. It’s that,<br />
we have a knowledge base and a resource base here that we can make available<br />
there, they’re putting all the coaches together in these environments and so yes,<br />
89