30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the organisation and the relationships that it has with others (Kayrooz & Trevitt, 2005). For<br />

example, in his research on alliances, Doz (1996) recruited participants that had been<br />

directly involved in the partnership. Hamel (1991) also interviewed those that were based<br />

on either side of the alliance.<br />

2) Potential participants currently in these positions were excluded from the<br />

research if they had been in the organisation for a period of less than three months. This<br />

exclusion criterion was established as anyone that had not been involved in the organisation<br />

for a substantial period would not have been able to adequately contribute to the topic of<br />

inter-partner research.<br />

3) As a backup plan, the offer was extended to past employees of these<br />

organisations, if those in the current role did not meet the previous criteria. If past<br />

employees were sought, they were required to have been involved within the organisation<br />

in the last three years. Any time spent previous to this period would have called into<br />

question the potential ability for participants to accurately recall information. However, all<br />

participants interviewed were currently employed by the organisation at the time they were<br />

interviewed as well as having been in that organisation for longer than the required three<br />

months. Therefore, there was no need to interview past employees of the organisation.<br />

It should be noted that members of the Board were not initially considered. The<br />

researcher and academic supervisors presumed that the Board were too distant in relation to<br />

the day-to-day running of the organisation. Therefore, the selected employees were in a<br />

better position to comment on the research topic. However, while conducting interviews<br />

with the initial selected participants one Board member’s name from each organisation was<br />

mentioned by a majority of the participants on a regular basis. This led the researcher to<br />

believe that the Board played a bigger role in the inter-partner relationship than first<br />

envisaged. Therefore, the selected Board members, whose names were mentioned in the<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!