CCNA Complete Guide 2nd Edition.pdf - Cisco Learning Home
CCNA Complete Guide 2nd Edition.pdf - Cisco Learning Home
CCNA Complete Guide 2nd Edition.pdf - Cisco Learning Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Route Summarization<br />
- The larger the network, more routes to advertise, larger routing update packets, more bandwidth<br />
the updates take, and hence reducing the bandwidth available for data transmission. Besides that,<br />
large IP networks also produce large routing tables, which consume more router memory, and<br />
take more time and CPU cycles to perform routing table lookup when routing a packet.<br />
- Route summarization reduces the size of routing updates and tables while still maintain routing<br />
information to all destination networks. It is also known as route aggregation or supernetting.<br />
- Route summarization also able to reduce convergences. Upstream routers that received the<br />
summary route do not have to reconverge whenever there is a status change in the component<br />
subnets, which can effectively insulate upstream routers from problems such as route flapping.<br />
Route flapping is when a network goes up and down on a router, causing it to constantly<br />
advertise the status about the network.<br />
- A requirement for route summarization is a classless routing protocol (eg: RIPv2, EIGRP, OSPF,<br />
IS-IS, and BGP) must be running, as they support variable-length subnet masks (VLSMs) and<br />
carry subnet mask information along with the routing updates.<br />
- A summary route substitutes multiple original component routes. Once configured, the routing<br />
protocol advertises only the single summary route instead of multiple specific component routes.<br />
- Route summarization works great in contiguous networks that were designed and planned for it.<br />
10.2.1.0<br />
10.2.2.0<br />
10.2.3.0<br />
10.2.4.0<br />
Figure 15-3: A Network Designed and Planned for Route Summarization<br />
- Below shows the routing table on RT2 before route summarization, with EIGRP as the routing<br />
protocol. It shows 4 routes to 10.2.x.x subnets out its Serial0/0 interface to RT1, and 4 routes to<br />
10.3.x.x subnets out its Serial0/1 interface to RT3:<br />
RT2#sh ip route<br />
Gateway of last resort is not set<br />
RT1 10.1.2.0/30 RT2 10.1.3.0/30 RT3<br />
S0/0<br />
S0/0<br />
S0/0<br />
10.1.1.0/24<br />
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 11 subnets, 2 masks<br />
C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet1/0<br />
C 10.1.2.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0/0<br />
C 10.1.3.0/30 is directly connected, Serial0/1<br />
D 10.2.1.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.2.1, 00:02:13, Serial0/0<br />
D 10.2.2.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.2.1, 00:02:13, Serial0/0<br />
D 10.2.3.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.2.1, 00:02:13, Serial0/0<br />
D 10.2.4.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.2.1, 00:02:13, Serial0/0<br />
D 10.3.4.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.3.2, 00:00:18, Serial0/1<br />
D 10.3.5.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.3.2, 00:00:18, Serial0/1<br />
D 10.3.6.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.3.2, 00:00:19, Serial0/1<br />
D 10.3.7.0/24 [90/2195456] via 10.1.3.2, 00:00:19, Serial0/1<br />
RT2#<br />
113<br />
S0/1<br />
10.3.4.0<br />
10.3.5.0<br />
10.3.6.0<br />
10.3.7.0<br />
Copyright © 2008 Yap Chin Hoong<br />
yapchinhoong@hotmail.com