19.07.2013 Views

CCNA Complete Guide 2nd Edition.pdf - Cisco Learning Home

CCNA Complete Guide 2nd Edition.pdf - Cisco Learning Home

CCNA Complete Guide 2nd Edition.pdf - Cisco Learning Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Maximum Hop Count Hop count metric increases each time a route passes through a router.<br />

It is able to solve counting to infinity problem by defining a<br />

maximum hop count. This is not a good solution since packets will<br />

still loop in the network until all routers removed or flushed the bad<br />

route from their routing tables.<br />

Holddown When a router (RT1) did not receive the periodic routing update for a<br />

particular subnet from another router (RT2) after the invalid timer is<br />

expired (due to the passive interface configuration or RT2 is down),<br />

the route will be placed into holddown state (x is possibly down).<br />

During this period, the router will ignore or suppress any incoming<br />

updates about alternative routes to that subnet (from routers other<br />

than RT2) until either a route with better metric is received (from<br />

RT2) or the holddown timer expires.<br />

It is able to prevent counting to infinity problem that split horizon<br />

does not solve, eg: networks with redundant links (Figure 11-4).<br />

Triggered Updates Without waiting for the regular scheduled routing update timer to<br />

expire, a router will immediately send out an update as soon as a<br />

directly connected subnet has changed state (up or down), which<br />

intends to speed up convergence time. Also known as flash updates.<br />

- Note: Some loop-avoidance features, eg: holddown, slow down convergence. Loop-avoidance<br />

features on distance-vector routing protocols are enabled and activated by default.<br />

172.16.3.0 1<br />

RT2 RT3<br />

172.16.3.0 2 172.16.3.0 16<br />

2<br />

1<br />

RT1<br />

172.16.3.0<br />

172.16.3.0 16<br />

Figure 11-4: Counting to Infinity on Redundant Network<br />

- Figure 11-4 shows another routing loop scenario – counting to infinity on redundant network<br />

(network with redundant links).<br />

- Imagine that RT3 send out an update to RT1 and RT2 right after the link to 172.16.3.0 has failed.<br />

However, RT1’s update timer expires at the same time and it sends out an update contains route<br />

to 172.16.3.0 to RT2 (RT1 does not send the update to RT3 due to split horizon). RT2 chooses<br />

the metric 2 route through RT1 between the RT3 infinite metric route and RT1 metric 1 route.<br />

Note: Routers normally (and should) advertise the metric to a destination network based on the<br />

metric in the routing table. However, RIP advertises metric + 1 in the routing updates.<br />

- On RT2’s next update, it does not advertise the infinite metric route to 172.16.3.0 to RT3 (due to<br />

split horizon), but it does advertise the route with metric 2 to RT3. After a while, RT3 also<br />

advertise the route with metric 3 to RT1 after its update timer expires. Counting to infinity occurs<br />

in this scenario even with split horizon enabled. Holddown is used to prevent this problem.<br />

78<br />

Copyright © 2008 Yap Chin Hoong<br />

yapchinhoong@hotmail.com<br />

1<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!