Gudiyattam Gudiyattam Town - Municipal
Gudiyattam Gudiyattam Town - Municipal
Gudiyattam Gudiyattam Town - Municipal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annexure Final Report: <strong>Gudiyattam</strong> <strong>Municipal</strong>ity<br />
37 Thiru.M.Baskaran Councilor 94431 14187<br />
38 Thiru.M.E.Parthiban Councilor 04171-329300<br />
The stakeholdersí workshop started at 11:30 AM on Saturday, January 26, 2008 in the<br />
Conference Hall of the <strong>Municipal</strong>ity. The workshop was chaired by Chairman ñ Thiru<br />
R.S.Shivaprakasam. In His opening speech, Mr. Shivaprakasam briefed the<br />
stakeholders about the objectives of the project and the workshop. The Acting<br />
Commissioner & <strong>Municipal</strong> Engineer of The <strong>Municipal</strong>ity Thiru U.Saravanan presented<br />
his view on the City Corporate cum Business Plan. Vice ñ Chairman Thiru.<br />
S.Soundarrajan presented the general view of the town. Mr. Sanjeet Ahlawat<br />
(Manager, Voyants Solutions Private Limited) briefed about the work completed by<br />
the consultant for the City Corporate cum Business Plan. After that Mr. Saravanan &<br />
Mr. Sathiyaraj presented the brief status, problem and issues relating to urban basic<br />
services an infrastructure in <strong>Gudiyattam</strong>. And after this presentation, the<br />
stakeholders were asked to give their suggestions/ comments in three parts. In first<br />
part, the consultants invited comments on the contents of the presentation. In the<br />
second part stakeholders were invited to present the problems of the city which are<br />
hindrances to the development. In the last section of the workshop, stakeholders<br />
were asked to suggest the projects required for the integrated development of<br />
<strong>Gudiyattam</strong>.<br />
The Suggestions:<br />
The suggestions given by the various stakeholders are presented below:<br />
Thiru R.S.Shivaprakasam, Chairman<br />
City is having very less fund for infrastructure development, though industrialists<br />
and business man belong to this want to contribute for improvement<br />
infrastructure of town but that fund also is not sufficient<br />
Grant from Government is very low so they can not initiate the development of<br />
basic infrastructure.<br />
People are ready to pay for provision of infrastructure but it should be quality<br />
infrastructure and nominal for them as they are paying for RO treated water<br />
supply.<br />
<strong>Town</strong> roads are encroached by the people so they should be fined and need<br />
widenening for congestion free traffic.<br />
The formula to calculate the Propoerty tax is wrong it should be revised as a<br />
person living in a single floor with small house is paying the same price, what a<br />
person with 3 floor is paying.<br />
There is a need to provide infrastructure to Govt. School as the quality of<br />
infrastructure is very poor.<br />
Sewerage system and replacement of Water line is on priority and after that the<br />
road work should start.<br />
- 168 -<br />
Voyants Solutions Private Limited