02.08.2013 Views

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4.4. Virginia competent vect<strong>or</strong> mosquito surveillance statistics by month f<strong>or</strong> 2000-<br />

2006.<br />

Month Rec<strong>or</strong>ds b #<br />

Mosquitoes a<br />

# Trap # Trap # Mosquitoes Mean # Abundance<br />

Sites Nights per Trap Night Mosquitoes Index c<br />

January 10 140 7 10 14.00 20.60 1.33<br />

March 4 10 4 4 2.50 11.50 0.24<br />

April 699 28236 219 1517 18.61 16.10 1.77<br />

May 3215 191518 573 12298 15.57 15.34 1.48<br />

June 5225 264894 856 20790 12.74 16.52 1.21<br />

July 5454 263157 975 21068 12.49 16.74 1.18<br />

August 5900 195629 1168 23052 8.49 15.79 0.80<br />

September 5170 155406 965 20025 7.76 14.68 0.74<br />

October 3392 56548 688 10693 5.29 13.67 0.50<br />

November 697 12593 125 1315 9.58 16.41 0.91<br />

a The number <strong>of</strong> mosquitoes is the number <strong>of</strong> females trapped.<br />

b A rec<strong>or</strong>d is the monthly mean number <strong>of</strong> mosquitoes <strong>of</strong> a competent vect<strong>or</strong> species trapped at a given site.<br />

c The abundance indices were calculated using the following equation: [(number <strong>of</strong> female mosquitoes collected in the<br />

month) / (total number <strong>of</strong> female mosquitoes collected] / [(number <strong>of</strong> trap nights in the month) / (total number <strong>of</strong> trap<br />

nights)].<br />

Table 4.5 and Figure 4.2 show the number <strong>of</strong> each competent vect<strong>or</strong> species collected<br />

in Virginia. The greatest number <strong>of</strong> mosquitoes collected was Cx. restuans (16.96%), Cx.<br />

salinarius (15.57%), and Cx. pipiens (15.44%) followed by Ae. canadensis (15.08%), Ae.<br />

vexans (9.53%), Ae. albopictus (8.80%), Ae. triseriatus (6.44%), Ae. taeni<strong>or</strong>hynchus<br />

(2.29%), and Ae. sollicitans (0.58%). Ae. canadensis had the highest abundance index<br />

(2.47), followed by Cx. pipiens (1.20) and Ae. taeni<strong>or</strong>hynchus (1.20). Spatial maps showing<br />

trap site locations and mosquito density at the trap sites f<strong>or</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the 9 mosquito species<br />

considered to be potential competent RVF vect<strong>or</strong>s are displayed in Appendix A.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!