02.08.2013 Views

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

Sample A: Cover Page of Thesis, Project, or Dissertation Proposal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

serious public health challenge. Nevertheless, the potential f<strong>or</strong> bioterr<strong>or</strong>ist attacks against<br />

agricultural targets (agroterr<strong>or</strong>ism) is increasingly also recognized as a national security<br />

threat, particularly since the events <strong>of</strong> September 11, 2001 and the anthrax attacks that sh<strong>or</strong>tly<br />

followed (Smolinski et al. 2003, Monke 2006).<br />

The U.S. agricultural industry is vulnerable to an intentional RVF attack on livestock<br />

in N<strong>or</strong>th America. First, a RVF agroterr<strong>or</strong>ist attack would generate panic and fear (<strong>of</strong> human<br />

illness <strong>or</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> infected agricultural products) in a large p<strong>or</strong>tion <strong>of</strong> the population<br />

(Lane et al. 2001). Second, a RVF agroterr<strong>or</strong>ist attack could severely damage the economy<br />

(Ackerman and Giroux 2006). Paarlberg et al. (2002) estimated that a Foot and Mouth<br />

disease (FMD) outbreak similar to the one that occurred in the United Kingdom in 2001<br />

could result in $14 billion in U.S. farm income losses. A RVF outbreak in the United States<br />

has the potential to have a similar effect on the U.S. economy. Containment and eradication<br />

<strong>of</strong> the disease as well as disposal <strong>of</strong> contaminated products would be costly to individuals,<br />

businesses, and governments (Monke 2006). Further harm to the economy would result due<br />

to decreased sales associated with public fear <strong>of</strong> agricultural product consumption and/<strong>or</strong><br />

decreased food availability (Monke 2006). And U.S. revenues from agricultural product<br />

exp<strong>or</strong>ts (e.g., $60 billion in 2003) would be lost due to OIE trade restrictions associated with<br />

RVF (Monke 2006). The cost <strong>of</strong> RVF-induced trade bans between the H<strong>or</strong>n <strong>of</strong> Africa and<br />

the Arabian Peninsula has been estimated to be as much as U.S. $75 million per year<br />

(Chevalier et al. 2004a).<br />

The relative ease f<strong>or</strong> terr<strong>or</strong>ists to procure and disseminate animal pathogens<br />

(Ackerman and Giroux 2006) is another reason the U.S. agricultural industry is vulnerable to<br />

an intentional RVF attack on livestock. Terr<strong>or</strong>ists could obtain the virus from diseased<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!