06.08.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONFIDENTIAL<br />

Regulatory Affairs &<br />

Nutrition Communication – AJ/Se<br />

28 May 2008<br />

Page 12 of 16<br />

In this retrospective analysis, Livesey also calculated the corresponding GI and II values for<br />

the individual studies (Table 6). He obtained GI values between 32 and 49 with a mean GI<br />

of 37 and II values between 17 and 31 with a mean II of 25.<br />

Table 4: Average GI and II values of isomaltulose (intake as drink solution) calculated by Livesey<br />

(2004) in a retrospective data analysis of published blood glucose measurements.<br />

Study Dose [g] Type of subjects GI II<br />

SUGiRS 50 Healthy 32 27<br />

Macdonald and Daniel<br />

1983<br />

0,25 g/kg b.w. (~17,5) Healthy 45 17<br />

0,5 g/kg b.w. (~35) Healthy 49 28<br />

0,75 g/kg b.w. (~52,5) Healthy 37 31<br />

1,0 g/kg b.w. (~70) Healthy 34 25<br />

Kawai et al 1985 50 Healthy 32 22<br />

Kawai et al 1989 50 Healthy 32 26<br />

GI 37<br />

(32 – 49)<br />

II 25<br />

(17 – 31)<br />

Sucrose is known to cause a fast and high increase in blood glucose and insulin levels<br />

followed by a fast decrease which might include a drop down below baseline as an<br />

overreaction (hypoglycaemic reaction). This is a common pattern for medium to high<br />

glycemic carbohydrates. The physiological characteristics of isomaltulose differ significantly<br />

from those of sucrose.<br />

Isomaltulose is low glycemic<br />

Blood glucose measurements with both healthy and diabetic volunteers showed that – as a<br />

consequence of the lower rate of hydrolysis and subsequent slower absorption from the<br />

small intestine – isomaltulose exerts an overall low blood glucose rise over a longer period<br />

of time. The maximum rise in blood glucose concentration (peak) after isomaltulose was<br />

typically less than half that of sucrose. And also the total blood glucose response to the<br />

consumption of isomaltulose, as reflected by its GI, was significantly lower (about 32% of<br />

glucose) than sucrose (about 68% of glucose), (Sydney University’s Glycaemic Research<br />

Service (SUGiRS) 2002).<br />

For the purpose of comparison, foods or individual carbohydrates are classified – based on<br />

their GI – into high glycemic (GI of 70 or more), medium glycemic (GI of 56-69), and low<br />

glycemic (GI of 55 or less), (Brand-Miller et al 1999, Livesey 2003). A further class of very<br />

low glycemic (GI of 40 or less) was defined as well (Livesey 2003). According to this<br />

classification, isomaltulose is low or even very low glycemic and has the potential to reduce<br />

the glycemic properties of a food.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!