Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CONFIDENTIAL<br />
Regulatory Affairs &<br />
Nutrition Communication – AJ/Se<br />
28 May 2008<br />
Page 12 of 16<br />
In this retrospective analysis, Livesey also calculated the corresponding GI and II values for<br />
the individual studies (Table 6). He obtained GI values between 32 and 49 with a mean GI<br />
of 37 and II values between 17 and 31 with a mean II of 25.<br />
Table 4: Average GI and II values of isomaltulose (intake as drink solution) calculated by Livesey<br />
(2004) in a retrospective data analysis of published blood glucose measurements.<br />
Study Dose [g] Type of subjects GI II<br />
SUGiRS 50 Healthy 32 27<br />
Macdonald and Daniel<br />
1983<br />
0,25 g/kg b.w. (~17,5) Healthy 45 17<br />
0,5 g/kg b.w. (~35) Healthy 49 28<br />
0,75 g/kg b.w. (~52,5) Healthy 37 31<br />
1,0 g/kg b.w. (~70) Healthy 34 25<br />
Kawai et al 1985 50 Healthy 32 22<br />
Kawai et al 1989 50 Healthy 32 26<br />
GI 37<br />
(32 – 49)<br />
II 25<br />
(17 – 31)<br />
Sucrose is known to cause a fast and high increase in blood glucose and insulin levels<br />
followed by a fast decrease which might include a drop down below baseline as an<br />
overreaction (hypoglycaemic reaction). This is a common pattern for medium to high<br />
glycemic carbohydrates. The physiological characteristics of isomaltulose differ significantly<br />
from those of sucrose.<br />
Isomaltulose is low glycemic<br />
Blood glucose measurements with both healthy and diabetic volunteers showed that – as a<br />
consequence of the lower rate of hydrolysis and subsequent slower absorption from the<br />
small intestine – isomaltulose exerts an overall low blood glucose rise over a longer period<br />
of time. The maximum rise in blood glucose concentration (peak) after isomaltulose was<br />
typically less than half that of sucrose. And also the total blood glucose response to the<br />
consumption of isomaltulose, as reflected by its GI, was significantly lower (about 32% of<br />
glucose) than sucrose (about 68% of glucose), (Sydney University’s Glycaemic Research<br />
Service (SUGiRS) 2002).<br />
For the purpose of comparison, foods or individual carbohydrates are classified – based on<br />
their GI – into high glycemic (GI of 70 or more), medium glycemic (GI of 56-69), and low<br />
glycemic (GI of 55 or less), (Brand-Miller et al 1999, Livesey 2003). A further class of very<br />
low glycemic (GI of 40 or less) was defined as well (Livesey 2003). According to this<br />
classification, isomaltulose is low or even very low glycemic and has the potential to reduce<br />
the glycemic properties of a food.