06.08.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

glucose, starch, NSP) there is also negligible loss of cIE to<br />

urine, and so cUE can also be ignored. Under these<br />

circumstances (which do not apply to many polyols), the<br />

following equation is valid<br />

DE ¼ ME<br />

For carbohydrates that are fully absorbed and fully metabolized<br />

to CO2 and H 2O (‘available carbohydrates’, for<br />

example, glucose, starch), the following equation also<br />

applies:<br />

cIE ¼ DE ¼ ME<br />

For other types of carbohydrates, ME is less than cIE, either<br />

because there is some loss of cIE to faeces (cFE) and/or urine<br />

(cUE), as in the case of some polyols. Polyols, which are often<br />

used as bulk-sweetening agents, have fewer detrimental<br />

effects on teeth, lower glycemic indices and lower ME values<br />

than conventional sweet sugars (for example, glucose,<br />

fructose, sucrose). The proportion absorbed by the small<br />

intestine varies considerably with the type of polyol (Bernier<br />

and Pascal, 1990; Livesey, 1992; Finley and Leveille, 1996),<br />

and tends to decrease with increasing molecular weight. As<br />

much as 35% of the energy of polyols can be accounted for<br />

in faeces (digestibility of energy, 65–100%; although polyols<br />

are fermented and not recovered in faeces, some of the<br />

products of this fermentation are recovered in faeces). In<br />

addition, a variable proportion of absorbed polyols is lost in<br />

urine. A detailed discussion about the extent of absorption<br />

and metabolism of polyols by bacteria in the human colon<br />

and by human tissues is beyond the scope of this paper.<br />

However, the following brief points illustrate the variability<br />

in their physiological handling. The small intestine absorbs<br />

only about 2–5% of lactitol, which is almost completely<br />

recovered in urine (95%), with little oxidation by human<br />

tissues (suggested by studies involving intravenous administration<br />

of C-labelled lactitol (Bernier and Pascal, 1990)).<br />

The small intestine absorbs B25% of mannitol and, like<br />

lactitol, it is almost totally excreted in urine without<br />

metabolism by human tissues (again suggested by intravenous<br />

administration of labelled (Nasrallah and Iber, 1969)<br />

and unlabelled (Nasrallah and Iber, 1969) mannitol). In<br />

contrast, glycerol is completely absorbed and metabolized by<br />

human tissues, without excretion in urine. Sorbitol is<br />

absorbed to the extent of B50%, of which the majority<br />

(B85%) is metabolized by human tissues (Finley and<br />

Leveille, 1996).<br />

Most studies assessing ME of diets have been carried out in<br />

subjects close to N and energy balance. The DE and ME<br />

systems appear to overestimate DE and ME when energy<br />

intake is low, especially when accompanied by high NSP<br />

intake because apparent digestibility tends to be lower. Food<br />

energy values reflect the supply of energy and not whether it<br />

is spent. Some energy is deposited during growth and<br />

development of obesity. The combustible energy that is<br />

deposited in such situations corresponds to DE, which may<br />

Physiological aspects of energy metabolism<br />

M Elia and JH Cummings<br />

not be made available to oxidative metabolism, if for<br />

example it is retained during the growing process. Some of<br />

it may not be made available even if it were mobilized<br />

and metabolized, because incompletely combusted products<br />

of metabolism, such as urea, are excreted in urine<br />

(for protein, DE4ME). However, when carbohydrate is<br />

mobilized, it is usually totally oxidized (combustible<br />

energy ¼ DE ¼ ME). The issue is discussed further below—<br />

‘Calculating energy balance’.<br />

DE and ME values may be influenced by genetic factors<br />

and disease. For example, although lactose is assigned a<br />

digestibility coefficient of 1.0, so that cIE ¼ DE (also ¼ ME), in<br />

subjects with lactose malabsorption (Matthews et al., 2005;<br />

Montalto et al., 2006) (due to genetic factors that can affect<br />

entire populations, or to damage of intestinal lactase by<br />

gastroenteritis or enteropathy), not all the lactose is hydrolyzed<br />

and absorbed by the small intestine. Some of it reaches<br />

the colon, where it is fermented to produce faecal matter and<br />

gaseous end products (both of which reduce DE and ME) and<br />

SCFAs, which are absorbed and metabolized by human<br />

tissues. Another example concerns fructose, which when<br />

ingested in small quantities is fully absorbed by the small<br />

intestine, but when ingested in large quantities, can reach<br />

the large bowel, where it is fermented (Truswell et al.,<br />

1988). This fermentation results in some loss of energy<br />

to faeces (cFE) (for example, as bacterial biomass), which<br />

again reduces its DE and ME values. Yet another example<br />

involves loss of glucose in the urine of diabetic patients<br />

(metabolizability of o1.0; and MEoDE). Since DE and ME<br />

values vary between individuals and are affected by disease,<br />

the values in general use are based on average results<br />

obtained in ‘healthy’ subjects using doses of substrates that<br />

are likely to be ingested. Any errors in establishing DE values<br />

will not only affect ME values but also NME values, which is<br />

discussed next.<br />

Net metabolizable energy<br />

A criticism that has been raised against the ME system is that<br />

it fails to consider differences in the efficiency with which<br />

substrates supply biologically useful energy. The NME system<br />

is based on the concept of biological efficiency at the level of<br />

ATP and takes into account two specific processes, both of<br />

which have the effect of reducing metabolic efficiency. First,<br />

the heat of fermentation does not yield ATP to the host.<br />

Since this lowers the overall bioenergetic efficiency of the<br />

fermentable substrate, some workers have suggested using<br />

the term ‘true metabolizable energy’, which they have<br />

defined as ME minus the heat of fermentation (Bar, 1990;<br />

Bernier and Pascal, 1990). This approach, which is used in<br />

animal nutrition, differs from that in human nutrition,<br />

where the heat of fermentation is included in ME. Second,<br />

different fuels yield net ATP (ATP gain) with different<br />

bioenergetic efficiencies (Elia and Livesey, 1988, 1992;<br />

Blaxter, 1989). Those with lower efficiencies (for example,<br />

protein) will result in more heat production for the<br />

S45<br />

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!