06.08.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Item of PROY‐<br />

NOM‐051<br />

3.19<br />

Definition:<br />

“Dietary fibre”<br />

5.1.1<br />

“Energy<br />

calculation”<br />

5.1.4 “Energy<br />

content<br />

polyalcohols<br />

and<br />

polydextrose”<br />

Proposal Justification<br />

We support the Dietary<br />

Fibre definition of Codex<br />

Alimentarius including DP 3<br />

– 9 as stated in Footnote 2.<br />

Carbohydrates: 4 kcal/g –<br />

17 kJ<br />

Proteins: 4 kcal/g – 17 kJ<br />

Fats: 9 kcal/g – 37 kJ<br />

Alcohol: 7 kcal/g – 29 kJ<br />

Organic acids: 3 kcal/g – 13<br />

kJ<br />

Isomalt: 2.0 kcal/g – 8 kJ<br />

Lactitol: 2.0 kcal/g – 8 kJ<br />

Maltitol: 2.1 kcal/g – 8 kJ<br />

Mannitol: 1.6 kcal/g – 6 kJ<br />

Sorbitol: 2.6 kcal/g – 10 kJ<br />

Xylitol: 2.4 kcal/g – 10 kJ<br />

HSH (maltitol syrup): 3.0<br />

kcal/g – 12 kJ<br />

SSS/WCS/IML<br />

Regulatory Affairs<br />

October 22 nd , 2009, page 2 / 4<br />

Regarding this definition we want to stress that we support<br />

it, provided that as foreseen in footnote 2, carbohydrates<br />

with a DP (degree of polymerisation) of 3 to 9 monomeric<br />

units are included into the definition.<br />

Non‐digestible oligosaccharides, e.g. oligofructose do<br />

behave as dietary fibres, and these properties do not<br />

change at DP =10 or higher. It will also harmonise the<br />

Mexican DF definition with almost all other definitions, as<br />

proposed worldwide, including EU, EFSA, Institute of<br />

Medicin (US), FSANZ, ILSI, AACC…<br />

For those ingredients, for which the scientific basis for an<br />

individual energy value is established, this individual value<br />

should be used.<br />

Scientific evidence is available for the following energy<br />

conversions factors:<br />

‐ Inulin/oligofructose: in the US, a value of 1.5 kcal/g is<br />

used. Further support for this value is given in Annex 2.1.<br />

and Annex 2.2.<br />

For those ingredients, for which the scientific basis for an<br />

individual energy value is established, this individual value<br />

should be used.<br />

Having the NAFTA in mind, where US and Canada accepted<br />

deviated caloric values for polyols, if necessary scientific<br />

substantiation is available, it should also be appropriate as<br />

well for Mexico to handle the same caloric values:<br />

‐ US: each polyol has its own FDA notified energy<br />

conversion factor, based upon a scientific evaluation by<br />

FASEB (Federation of American Societies for Experimental<br />

Biology; 1994; “The Evaluation of the Energy of Certain<br />

Sugar Alcohols used as Food Ingredients”) [Annex 3.1].<br />

“Letter of no objection” received for caloric value of<br />

2.0 kcal/g for isomalt [Annex 3.2].<br />

‐ Canada: has confirmed the use of 2 kcal/g (http://www.hc‐<br />

sc.gc.ca/fn‐an/securit/addit/sweeten‐edulcor/polyols_polydextose_factsheet‐<br />

polyols_polydextose_fiche‐eng.php)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!