Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Item of PROY‐<br />
NOM‐051<br />
3.19<br />
Definition:<br />
“Dietary fibre”<br />
5.1.1<br />
“Energy<br />
calculation”<br />
5.1.4 “Energy<br />
content<br />
polyalcohols<br />
and<br />
polydextrose”<br />
Proposal Justification<br />
We support the Dietary<br />
Fibre definition of Codex<br />
Alimentarius including DP 3<br />
– 9 as stated in Footnote 2.<br />
Carbohydrates: 4 kcal/g –<br />
17 kJ<br />
Proteins: 4 kcal/g – 17 kJ<br />
Fats: 9 kcal/g – 37 kJ<br />
Alcohol: 7 kcal/g – 29 kJ<br />
Organic acids: 3 kcal/g – 13<br />
kJ<br />
Isomalt: 2.0 kcal/g – 8 kJ<br />
Lactitol: 2.0 kcal/g – 8 kJ<br />
Maltitol: 2.1 kcal/g – 8 kJ<br />
Mannitol: 1.6 kcal/g – 6 kJ<br />
Sorbitol: 2.6 kcal/g – 10 kJ<br />
Xylitol: 2.4 kcal/g – 10 kJ<br />
HSH (maltitol syrup): 3.0<br />
kcal/g – 12 kJ<br />
SSS/WCS/IML<br />
Regulatory Affairs<br />
October 22 nd , 2009, page 2 / 4<br />
Regarding this definition we want to stress that we support<br />
it, provided that as foreseen in footnote 2, carbohydrates<br />
with a DP (degree of polymerisation) of 3 to 9 monomeric<br />
units are included into the definition.<br />
Non‐digestible oligosaccharides, e.g. oligofructose do<br />
behave as dietary fibres, and these properties do not<br />
change at DP =10 or higher. It will also harmonise the<br />
Mexican DF definition with almost all other definitions, as<br />
proposed worldwide, including EU, EFSA, Institute of<br />
Medicin (US), FSANZ, ILSI, AACC…<br />
For those ingredients, for which the scientific basis for an<br />
individual energy value is established, this individual value<br />
should be used.<br />
Scientific evidence is available for the following energy<br />
conversions factors:<br />
‐ Inulin/oligofructose: in the US, a value of 1.5 kcal/g is<br />
used. Further support for this value is given in Annex 2.1.<br />
and Annex 2.2.<br />
For those ingredients, for which the scientific basis for an<br />
individual energy value is established, this individual value<br />
should be used.<br />
Having the NAFTA in mind, where US and Canada accepted<br />
deviated caloric values for polyols, if necessary scientific<br />
substantiation is available, it should also be appropriate as<br />
well for Mexico to handle the same caloric values:<br />
‐ US: each polyol has its own FDA notified energy<br />
conversion factor, based upon a scientific evaluation by<br />
FASEB (Federation of American Societies for Experimental<br />
Biology; 1994; “The Evaluation of the Energy of Certain<br />
Sugar Alcohols used as Food Ingredients”) [Annex 3.1].<br />
“Letter of no objection” received for caloric value of<br />
2.0 kcal/g for isomalt [Annex 3.2].<br />
‐ Canada: has confirmed the use of 2 kcal/g (http://www.hc‐<br />
sc.gc.ca/fn‐an/securit/addit/sweeten‐edulcor/polyols_polydextose_factsheet‐<br />
polyols_polydextose_fiche‐eng.php)