06.08.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S68<br />

while considering their digestion and digestibility, a whole<br />

gut approach should be used.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Being quantitatively the most important dietary energy<br />

source for most populations, carbohydrates have a special<br />

role to play in energy metabolism and homeostasis. The<br />

overview provided here deals with only selected physiological<br />

effects of energy metabolism and gastrointestinal effects<br />

of carbohydrates and their health implications. Several<br />

carbohydrate-specific theories of appetite regulation have<br />

been proposed but none are universally accepted, although<br />

high-carbohydrate, low-energy-density diets rich in fruit,<br />

vegetables and fibre are often recommended for weight<br />

reduction or prevention of weight gain. Appetite and<br />

hunger, which are of fundamental to survival, appear to<br />

have many layers of control, with one layer compensating or<br />

dominating another in some circumstances. The recent<br />

growth of overweight and obesity throughout the world is<br />

related to lifestyle changes, which have placed the human in<br />

the unusual situation (at least in evolutionary terms) of<br />

having to defend against a combination of persistent<br />

abundance of tasty food and reduced physical activity. There<br />

is a need to better understand the interaction between<br />

energy density, GI/load, palatability and other factors and<br />

their effects on feeding behaviour. At the same time, there is<br />

room to establish more rational national and international<br />

dietary energy systems and to consider greater application of<br />

the NME system, which has some advantages over the more<br />

commonly used, ME system.<br />

The other physiological effects of many carbohydrates<br />

depend on the site, rate and extent of their digestion in and<br />

absorption from the gut. The majority of mono- and<br />

disaccharides, together with maltodextrins and most starch,<br />

are hydrolyzed by pancreatic enzymes in the small bowel<br />

and at the epithelial surface, and the resultant monosaccharide<br />

mixtures absorbed transported to the liver and then<br />

stored or metabolized. These carbohydrates are primarily<br />

energy yielding. The non-a-glucan oligosaccharides have<br />

other properties, in that they increase calcium absorption<br />

and some selectively modify the composition of the large<br />

bowel microbiota to one dominated by bifidobacteria and<br />

lactobacilli, known as the prebiotic effect. Studies to<br />

demonstrate proven health benefits of prebiotics are<br />

awaited.<br />

The prebiotic carbohydrates, along with NSP, RS and some<br />

polyols, reach the large bowel where they are fermented. The<br />

principal end products, SCFA, are absorbed and provide a<br />

further energy source to the tissues. Fermentation benefits<br />

bowel habit, although the effects can be very small, and<br />

provides mechanisms that could be important in cancer<br />

prevention in the colon.<br />

In the digestion of carbohydrates, the gut acts as an<br />

integrated organ with distinct regions of function. The<br />

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition<br />

Physiological aspects of energy metabolism<br />

M Elia and JH Cummings<br />

nature of carbohydrate, both its chemical and physical<br />

properties, together with the physiological responses of<br />

absorption and secretion, local and visceral neuro-endocrine<br />

reflexes, enzyme section and microbial activity, determine<br />

the varied responses to carbohydrate in our diet.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We thank Professor Nils-Georg Asp, Professor Arne V Astrup,<br />

Professor Nancy Keim, Dr Geoffrey Livesey, Professor Ian<br />

MacDonald, Dr Gabriele Riccardi, Professor A Steward<br />

Truswell and Dr Ricardo Uauy for the valuable comments<br />

they provided on the earlier manuscript. We also thank Dr<br />

Klaus Englyst and Dr R James Stubbs for helpful comments.<br />

Conflict of interest<br />

During the preparation and peer review of this paper in 2006,<br />

the authors and peer reviewers declared the following<br />

interests.<br />

Authors<br />

Professor John Cummings: Chairman, Biotherapeutics<br />

Committee, Danone; Member, Working Group on Foods<br />

with Health Benefits, Danone; funding for research work at<br />

the University of Dundee, ORAFTI (2004).<br />

Professor Marinos Elia: Since undertaking this work,<br />

Professor Elia has joined a committee to undertake a<br />

systematic review on the role of fibre in enteral tube feeding,<br />

with an unrestricted grant from Numico.<br />

Peer-reviewers<br />

Professor Nils-Georg Asp: On part-time leave from university<br />

professorship to be the Director of the Swedish<br />

Nutrition Foundation (SNF), a nongovernmental organization<br />

for the promotion of nutrition research and its practical<br />

implications. SNF is supported broadly by the food sector;<br />

the member organizations and industries are listed on the<br />

SNF home page (www.snf.ideon.se).<br />

Professor Arne V Astrup: Research grants from Arla Foods,<br />

Danish Diary Association, Danish Meat Industry, Dutch<br />

Diary Association, Schulstad (Bakery), Unilever and Weight<br />

Watchers; speaker for Campina/Dutch Diary Association and<br />

Suikerstichting, Holland.<br />

Professor Nancy Keim: None declared.<br />

Dr Geoffrey Livesey: Director and shareholder of Independent<br />

Nutrition Logic Ltd, which also employs him as a<br />

consultant to work with commercial, governmental and<br />

educational establishments and to undertake research on<br />

commissioned works on matters regarding health and<br />

nutrition. Received payment or other support covering a<br />

period during 2002–2006, and has an expectation of support<br />

for the future from several commercial entities with an<br />

interest in the subject matter of the FAO/WHO scientific<br />

update, even if it does not convey any benefit to him<br />

personally, but which benefits his position or administrative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!