11.08.2013 Views

Untitled - Cdm.unimo.it

Untitled - Cdm.unimo.it

Untitled - Cdm.unimo.it

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11<br />

DOMAIN-DECOMPOSITION<br />

METHODS<br />

For several reasons, when approximating differential equations numerically, <strong>it</strong> is often<br />

convenient to decompose the domain, where the solution is defined, into different sub-<br />

sets. Then, independently in each subdomain, one computes polynomial approximations<br />

by the techniques introduced in the previous chapters. The goal now is to find a su<strong>it</strong>able<br />

way to match the different pieces to obtain a discretization of the global solution.<br />

11.1 Introductory remarks<br />

Recently, domain-decompos<strong>it</strong>ion (or multidomain) methods have become a fundamental<br />

subject of research in spectral methods. This is especially true for boundary-value<br />

problems in two or more space variables, when the solutions are defined in domains<br />

w<strong>it</strong>h a complicated geometry. Actually, spectral-type techniques are well su<strong>it</strong>ed for very<br />

simple domains, obtainable by cartesian products of intervals (see chapter thirteen). It<br />

is clear that, when the given domain does not conform w<strong>it</strong>h these requirements, setting<br />

up a spectral approximation scheme is not a straightforward procedure. From this point<br />

of view, this is a severe drawback in comparison w<strong>it</strong>h other more flexible methods, such<br />

as fin<strong>it</strong>e-differences or fin<strong>it</strong>e element methods.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!