28.08.2013 Views

Healthcare Waste Report - Environment Health

Healthcare Waste Report - Environment Health

Healthcare Waste Report - Environment Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The proceeds from the sale of recyclable<br />

wastes and the avoided treatment costs could<br />

be recursively invested in advancing the<br />

overall healthcare waste management system.<br />

<strong><strong>Health</strong>care</strong> waste also offers opportunities to<br />

take advantage of, it is a not a threat solely.<br />

Measure, if Not It Cannot Be<br />

Managed<br />

“You Can’t Manage What You Don’t<br />

Measure” is a classical management axiom<br />

and has been repeatedly proved. <strong><strong>Health</strong>care</strong><br />

waste is a critical subject involving costs and<br />

consequences and unless it is measured, is not<br />

possible to ascertain if it is getting better or<br />

worse. Managing for improvement is not<br />

impossible if it is not measured to understand<br />

what is getting better and what isn’t. To<br />

measure something, in general involves three<br />

central aspects:<br />

Measurement – The figure, extent, or<br />

amount obtained by measuring<br />

Metric - A standard of measurement<br />

Benchmark - A standard by which others<br />

may be measured<br />

When talking about measurement, the<br />

questions that strike minds of healthcare waste<br />

stakeholder are what should be measured, why<br />

it should be measured and how. All healthcare<br />

waste after segregation, in a universally<br />

accepted manner, should be measured.<br />

Measurements should be recorded and stored<br />

for easy access to authorized personnel.<br />

Standard procedures, following scientific<br />

methods have to be adopted for measuring and<br />

assumptions and auxiliary adjustments have to<br />

be clearly indicated. For example, when<br />

healthcare waste is measured, some country<br />

governments take into account the bed<br />

occupancy rate while some do not. In some<br />

countries, the overall country level healthcare<br />

waste, not considering segregation, is recorded<br />

and then converted to the specific values based<br />

on the bed count. It is here that metrics come<br />

into picture. Standard practices, reflecting top<br />

down approach of mathematically converting<br />

overall healthcare waste into specific values or<br />

bottom up approach by determining healthcare<br />

waste at hospital level and mathematically<br />

projecting to country data have to be established.<br />

Whatever, be the approach adopted, the metrics<br />

have to be clearly established and explained<br />

through proper documentation.<br />

The next important feature in measurement is<br />

benchmarks, which are often referred to as<br />

industry wide standards, for example x kg/<br />

bed/day. Benchmarks are important in that<br />

they assist in monitoring the amount of waste<br />

that is generated and could help implement<br />

waste minimization programmes at healthcare<br />

facilities. When benchmarks are established,<br />

healthcare facilities willing to cut down on the<br />

waste generation will be able to monitor<br />

themselves and compare their performance<br />

with peer groups within the country, region or<br />

the whole world, of course taking into account<br />

the economic status. Benchmarks may not be<br />

the correct way of comparing waste<br />

generation levels between a developed and<br />

developing country. This has to be taken into<br />

account when using benchmarks.<br />

127 HEALTHCARE WASTE IN ASIA: INTUITIONS & INSIGHTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!