05.10.2013 Views

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5. REAL CHAINS 15<br />

no overhangs allowed<br />

|r⊥(s)| too large<br />

z-axis<br />

Figure 2.4: Overhangs are and large changes <strong>in</strong> |r⊥(s)| are not allowed<br />

Note that this implies that ˙r|| is non-negative or <strong>in</strong> other words that overhangs,<br />

as shown <strong>in</strong> figure 2.4, are not allowed. The derivative<br />

¨r||(s) 2 <br />

1 d˙r⊥(s)<br />

≈<br />

2<br />

2 2 =<br />

ds<br />

˙r⊥(s) · ¨r⊥(s) 2 (2.29)<br />

is already anharmonic and can therefore be neglected. Why this term does not<br />

contribute is easily seen <strong>in</strong> Fourier space. Due to the derivatives this term depends<br />

on the wave-vector as k 6 . S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> stiff polymers high frequency modes are<br />

suppressed by the bend<strong>in</strong>g energy, this term can be neglected. The term ¨r||(s) <strong>in</strong><br />

the relation ¨r(s) 2 = ¨r⊥(s) 2 + ¨r||(s) 2 can be dropped<br />

¨r(s) ≈ ¨r⊥(s). (2.30)<br />

This leads to the bend<strong>in</strong>g energy Hamiltonian <strong>in</strong> the weakly-bend<strong>in</strong>g rod approximation5<br />

Hwb[r⊥(s)] = κ<br />

2<br />

L<br />

0<br />

ds ¨r⊥(s) 2 = κ<br />

2<br />

L<br />

0<br />

ds ¨x(s) 2 + ¨y(s) 2 . (2.31)<br />

Now the <strong>in</strong>extensibility constra<strong>in</strong>t is implicitly, i.e. automatically, fulfilled. The<br />

path-<strong>in</strong>tegral for the partition sum, eq. (2.19), has been simplified, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

<strong>in</strong>extensibility constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> weakly-bend<strong>in</strong>g rod approximation leaves only two<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent components.<br />

This approximation is also called Monge-representation to <strong>in</strong>dicate the chosen<br />

parametrization. The s<strong>in</strong>gle valued contour is parametrized <strong>in</strong> reference to a<br />

reference l<strong>in</strong>e by the undulations 6 .<br />

2.5 Real cha<strong>in</strong>s<br />

We have dealt so far with idealized cha<strong>in</strong>s represented by segments or a cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

space curve, allowed to <strong>in</strong>terpenetrate each other. Therefore these models are<br />

5In classical elasticity theory the energy of a weakly-bend<strong>in</strong>g rod has exactly the same form<br />

as this Hamiltonian (cf. [23]).<br />

6In differential geometry the Monge-representation is used to parametrize s<strong>in</strong>gle-valued<br />

planes by a ‘hight’ over a reference plane.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!