05.10.2013 Views

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 CHAPTER 2. POLYMER MODELS<br />

frequently called phantom cha<strong>in</strong>s. But <strong>in</strong> reality polymers are charged objects <strong>in</strong><br />

a solution surrounded by charges. Therefore the <strong>in</strong>teraction between the polymer<br />

segments is very complex and depends on the solution. But often one is entitled<br />

to replace these <strong>in</strong>teraction by a simplified hard core <strong>in</strong>teraction. The next step <strong>in</strong><br />

the direction of a more realistic model is then to <strong>in</strong>corporate self-avoidance effects<br />

as a steep short-ranged repulsive potential between the segments (of the order of<br />

the microscopic polymer thickness). The polymer is not allowed to <strong>in</strong>tersect with<br />

itself 7 . For detailed description of models with ‘realistic’ features confer e.g. [39].<br />

The <strong>in</strong>fluence of the self-avoidance/excluded volume is visible <strong>in</strong> particular<br />

for flexible/long (i.e. a large ratio of L/lp) cha<strong>in</strong>s s<strong>in</strong>ce they fold back and forth<br />

freely, therefore cross<strong>in</strong>g themselves very often. As a result the polymer will tend<br />

to be more extended than a phantom cha<strong>in</strong> due to the reduced number of allowed<br />

configurations (entropic penalty) <strong>in</strong> the strongly collapsed state. In contrast for<br />

stiff polymers the effect is mostly negligible s<strong>in</strong>ce it is unlikely for them to fold<br />

back onto themselves.<br />

At variance with the description of the ideal phantom cha<strong>in</strong> as a random walk,<br />

the self-avoid<strong>in</strong>g random walk can be used to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the properties of these<br />

cha<strong>in</strong>s. But we want to focus on the derivation of the basic scal<strong>in</strong>g relation for<br />

the end-to-end distance.<br />

The considerations of the “entropic penalty” can be used to derive a scal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

relation similar to eq. (2.6) for the ideal cha<strong>in</strong>. This argument dates back to P.<br />

Flory and is described <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> [8] and [39]. It considers a correction to the<br />

free energy of the ideal cha<strong>in</strong>, eq. (2.8), that is due to the excluded volume which,<br />

<strong>in</strong> turn, depends on the number of monomer-monomer contacts. Let v be the<br />

mean volume occupied by a monomer depend<strong>in</strong>g on the segment length b and<br />

the thickness of the cha<strong>in</strong> d. The monomer density φ of a cha<strong>in</strong> of l<strong>in</strong>ear size R<br />

which occupies a sphere of about the volume R 3 is<br />

φ ∼ Nv<br />

. (2.32)<br />

R3 The entropy loss for an exclusion is of order kBT for each degree of freedom<br />

(equipartition theorem). S<strong>in</strong>ce there are N monomers the free energy correction<br />

is<br />

F ∼ kBT v<br />

N 2<br />

. (2.33)<br />

R3 Additionally us<strong>in</strong>g the free energy of the ideal cha<strong>in</strong>, eq. (2.8), one can m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

the sum of these contributions with respect to the end-to-end distance R. We<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> the scal<strong>in</strong>g result<br />

R ∼ (b 2 v) 1/5 N 3/5 . (2.34)<br />

7 There exists a so called θ-temperature (depend<strong>in</strong>g on the solution) where the segmentsegment<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction is exactly balanced by effects from the surround<strong>in</strong>g solution. Then the<br />

description of an ideal cha<strong>in</strong> is valid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!