05.10.2013 Views

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

Polymers in Confined Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 CHAPTER 5. SIMULATION RESULTS<br />

R<br />

R ||<br />

Figure 5.10: Behavior of the end-to-end distances of flexible cha<strong>in</strong>s upon conf<strong>in</strong>ement.<br />

A representative example of these observables for a flexible cha<strong>in</strong> ɛ = 10 is<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> figure 5.9, where the mean-square and mean-square parallel end-to-end<br />

distance, 〈R2 〉 and R2 <br />

|| , are plotted as a function of the collision parameter c.<br />

The full end-to-end distance exhibits a ‘dip’ (local m<strong>in</strong>imum) for c ≈ 1, when the<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>s to notice the tube through deflections. This dip is absent for R2 <br />

|| .<br />

The two limits, c → 0 and c → ∞, are easily understood: In the limit of<br />

an unconf<strong>in</strong>ed cha<strong>in</strong> (c < 1) the average of the z-component is exactly a third<br />

of the full average R2 <br />

2<br />

|| = 〈R 〉 /3. In the opposite limit, when the conf<strong>in</strong>ement<br />

becomes larger (c > 20), both observables, 〈R2 〉 and R2 <br />

|| , behave identically<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce the polymer is oriented ma<strong>in</strong>ly along the tube. Therefore the end-to-end<br />

distance is nearly parallel to the tube axis.<br />

The dip—which has also been observed without explanation <strong>in</strong> [43]—can be<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed as illustrated <strong>in</strong> figure 5.10. Upon conf<strong>in</strong>ement of the flexible cha<strong>in</strong>,<br />

the <strong>in</strong>itially randomly oriented end-to-end distance is h<strong>in</strong>dered <strong>in</strong> the perpendicular<br />

directions. This implies that first the end-to-end distance is changed<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>antly perpendicular to the tube axis, only decreas<strong>in</strong>g the value of 〈R2 〉<br />

but leav<strong>in</strong>g R2 <br />

|| unchanged. Formation of the dip should start, as seen <strong>in</strong> figure<br />

5.9, at a value of c 1. Upon further conf<strong>in</strong>ement the end-to-end distance<br />

slowly starts giv<strong>in</strong>g way <strong>in</strong> the direction along the tube, f<strong>in</strong>ally also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the parallel component.<br />

The behavior of the end-to-end distances upon conf<strong>in</strong>ement can also be seen<br />

<strong>in</strong> the shape of the radial distribution functions (see next section 5.2.5).<br />

The dip is present <strong>in</strong> all end-to-end distances <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> section 4.6, as it<br />

is absent for all parallel end-to-end distances.<br />

5.2.5 Radial distribution function<br />

In this section we are go<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the probability distribution of the<br />

end-to-end distance or radial distribution function (RDF) (see section 3.3.3 for<br />

a discussion of the RDF <strong>in</strong> the unconf<strong>in</strong>ed case). Figures 5.11 show some representative<br />

numerical results for a cha<strong>in</strong> with flexibility ɛ = 10 and for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collision parameter c.<br />

The RDF for the end-to-end distance R is shown <strong>in</strong> figure 5.11(a) and for<br />

δR ||<br />

δR<br />

d

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!