3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Executive summary<br />
Member States (Cyprus, Finl<strong>and</strong>, France, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,<br />
Pol<strong>and</strong>, Portugal, Spain, Slovakia, United Kingdom).<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> banks participating in the <strong>state</strong> guarantee scheme issued only <strong>state</strong>-<strong>guaranteed</strong><br />
<strong>bonds</strong> during the period covered by the study while a minority issued both <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong>.<br />
The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issues had a maturity <strong>of</strong> 3 to 5 years, the maximum tenor<br />
permitted under the scheme.<br />
Empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> issuing <strong>costs</strong><br />
The statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee to a short- to mediumterm<br />
bond issue shows that, on average, the market value <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees was 33bps.<br />
The empirical result that the presence <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee reduces issuance <strong>costs</strong> is robust across<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> models <strong>and</strong> variable specifications. But, the estimated magnitude <strong>of</strong> the impacts<br />
varies somewhat, ranging from 18 bps to 57 bps.<br />
A more detailed estimation, allowing for impact to vary across the actual size <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>costs</strong><br />
shows that, with the exception <strong>of</strong> the banks facing the highest issuance <strong>costs</strong>, the estimated<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees on issuance <strong>costs</strong> increases with the level <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>costs</strong>.<br />
Moreover, there is evidence <strong>of</strong> a ratings upgrade effect ins<strong>of</strong>ar as <strong>state</strong> guarantees had a sizeable<br />
statistically significant impact on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> rated BBB-/BBB/BBB+, in the order <strong>of</strong><br />
over 200bps.<br />
While each individual <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issue benefited from the <strong>state</strong> guarantee through a<br />
lower issue cost, all bond issues (<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong>) were impacted<br />
negatively by the overall volume <strong>of</strong> SG bond issues during a month. Quantitatively, each bond<br />
issue faced a higher issuance cost <strong>of</strong> 10.5bps, on average, as a result <strong>of</strong> the overall volume <strong>of</strong> SG<br />
issuance activity in a given month.<br />
Moreover, this negative impact is marginally higher for non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> issued by<br />
banks which did not participate in the scheme (0.07 bps for each tranche <strong>of</strong> €1billion in <strong>state</strong><br />
<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> issued) than for <strong>bonds</strong> (<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong>) issued by<br />
participating banks. In the case <strong>of</strong> the latter, only <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issues were impacted.<br />
This indirect effect is entirely domestic as the monthly volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issues<br />
outside a Member State is not found to impact on the issuance cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong> non<strong>state</strong><br />
<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> in the domestic market.<br />
Empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability performance<br />
The impact on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees to bond<br />
issues by banks varies. A simple, descriptive analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the guarantees provided in<br />
2009 shows that in the following year (i.e., 2010),<br />
viii<br />
banks having issued <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> increased their net loan book by less than banks<br />
having issued noon-<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> that would have been eligible;