22.10.2013 Views

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive summary<br />

Member States (Cyprus, Finl<strong>and</strong>, France, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong>, Portugal, Spain, Slovakia, United Kingdom).<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> banks participating in the <strong>state</strong> guarantee scheme issued only <strong>state</strong>-<strong>guaranteed</strong><br />

<strong>bonds</strong> during the period covered by the study while a minority issued both <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong>.<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issues had a maturity <strong>of</strong> 3 to 5 years, the maximum tenor<br />

permitted under the scheme.<br />

Empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> issuing <strong>costs</strong><br />

The statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee to a short- to mediumterm<br />

bond issue shows that, on average, the market value <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees was 33bps.<br />

The empirical result that the presence <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee reduces issuance <strong>costs</strong> is robust across<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> models <strong>and</strong> variable specifications. But, the estimated magnitude <strong>of</strong> the impacts<br />

varies somewhat, ranging from 18 bps to 57 bps.<br />

A more detailed estimation, allowing for impact to vary across the actual size <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>costs</strong><br />

shows that, with the exception <strong>of</strong> the banks facing the highest issuance <strong>costs</strong>, the estimated<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees on issuance <strong>costs</strong> increases with the level <strong>of</strong> issuance <strong>costs</strong>.<br />

Moreover, there is evidence <strong>of</strong> a ratings upgrade effect ins<strong>of</strong>ar as <strong>state</strong> guarantees had a sizeable<br />

statistically significant impact on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> rated BBB-/BBB/BBB+, in the order <strong>of</strong><br />

over 200bps.<br />

While each individual <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issue benefited from the <strong>state</strong> guarantee through a<br />

lower issue cost, all bond issues (<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong>) were impacted<br />

negatively by the overall volume <strong>of</strong> SG bond issues during a month. Quantitatively, each bond<br />

issue faced a higher issuance cost <strong>of</strong> 10.5bps, on average, as a result <strong>of</strong> the overall volume <strong>of</strong> SG<br />

issuance activity in a given month.<br />

Moreover, this negative impact is marginally higher for non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> issued by<br />

banks which did not participate in the scheme (0.07 bps for each tranche <strong>of</strong> €1billion in <strong>state</strong><br />

<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> issued) than for <strong>bonds</strong> (<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong>) issued by<br />

participating banks. In the case <strong>of</strong> the latter, only <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issues were impacted.<br />

This indirect effect is entirely domestic as the monthly volume <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> bond issues<br />

outside a Member State is not found to impact on the issuance cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>and</strong> non<strong>state</strong><br />

<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> in the domestic market.<br />

Empirical analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability performance<br />

The impact on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability <strong>of</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees to bond<br />

issues by banks varies. A simple, descriptive analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the guarantees provided in<br />

2009 shows that in the following year (i.e., 2010),<br />

viii<br />

banks having issued <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> increased their net loan book by less than banks<br />

having issued noon-<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> that would have been eligible;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!