3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 <strong>Issuing</strong> <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong><br />
participating banks, <strong>and</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong>. The results <strong>of</strong> this analysis are presented in<br />
Table 11.<br />
The indirect effect on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks that received no <strong>state</strong> guarantees is compared to<br />
that faced by banks that did receive <strong>state</strong> guarantees. The results are unsurprising ins<strong>of</strong>ar as there<br />
is a negative indirect effect on both types <strong>of</strong> bank in the order <strong>of</strong> 0.04-0.08bps for each additional<br />
€1bn SG bond issue.<br />
In regard to banks that received <strong>state</strong> guarantees, this finding indicates that the net effect <strong>of</strong> SG<br />
bond issuing activity on issuing cost is lower than the direct effect estimated previously once one<br />
accounts for the indirect effect <strong>of</strong> other SG <strong>bonds</strong> being issued. On average, €263bn <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong><br />
was issued per month implying that the indirect effect <strong>of</strong> SG issues on a given bond was -10.5bps<br />
(€263bn*0.0400bps). This means that the net effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees was in the order <strong>of</strong><br />
22.9bps on average (33.4-10.5).<br />
It is interesting to note that the indirect effect on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks not issuing SG <strong>bonds</strong> is<br />
larger than on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks issuing SG <strong>bonds</strong>. Indeed, the indirect effect <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong><br />
on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks not issuing SG <strong>bonds</strong> is in the order <strong>of</strong> 20.3bps (€263bn*0.0771bps),<br />
on average.<br />
This difference was investigated in more detail by re-estimating the main empirical specification<br />
for indirect effects on a subsample <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> issued by banks participating in <strong>state</strong><br />
guarantee schemes only.<br />
Interestingly, the estimated 15 indirect effect on non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> issued by banks participating in <strong>state</strong><br />
guarantee schemes in the order <strong>of</strong> -0.06bps for each additional €1bn SG bond issue. This suggests<br />
that participation in a <strong>state</strong> guarantee scheme may signal bank-level financial stability that results<br />
in the issuing cost <strong>of</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> being lower than for otherwise similar non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> (although<br />
this effect is not significant due to the small sample size).<br />
Re-estimating the main empirical specification on the impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees on issuing cost<br />
supports this view. While the average impact <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee on issuing cost is 33.4bps, the<br />
estimated impact for the subsample <strong>of</strong> banks issuing both SG <strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> is 56.7bps.<br />
15 It is important to note that in the context <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the issuance <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong> on the issuance cost <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>and</strong><br />
non-SG <strong>bonds</strong>, an externality is defined as negative if the effect <strong>of</strong> the issuance <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong> is to increase the issuance cost <strong>of</strong> all<br />
<strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> as a positive externality if the effect is to reduce issuance cost.<br />
72