22.10.2013 Views

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 <strong>Issuing</strong> <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong><br />

participating banks, <strong>and</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong>. The results <strong>of</strong> this analysis are presented in<br />

Table 11.<br />

The indirect effect on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks that received no <strong>state</strong> guarantees is compared to<br />

that faced by banks that did receive <strong>state</strong> guarantees. The results are unsurprising ins<strong>of</strong>ar as there<br />

is a negative indirect effect on both types <strong>of</strong> bank in the order <strong>of</strong> 0.04-0.08bps for each additional<br />

€1bn SG bond issue.<br />

In regard to banks that received <strong>state</strong> guarantees, this finding indicates that the net effect <strong>of</strong> SG<br />

bond issuing activity on issuing cost is lower than the direct effect estimated previously once one<br />

accounts for the indirect effect <strong>of</strong> other SG <strong>bonds</strong> being issued. On average, €263bn <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong><br />

was issued per month implying that the indirect effect <strong>of</strong> SG issues on a given bond was -10.5bps<br />

(€263bn*0.0400bps). This means that the net effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees was in the order <strong>of</strong><br />

22.9bps on average (33.4-10.5).<br />

It is interesting to note that the indirect effect on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks not issuing SG <strong>bonds</strong> is<br />

larger than on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks issuing SG <strong>bonds</strong>. Indeed, the indirect effect <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong><br />

on the issuing <strong>costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> banks not issuing SG <strong>bonds</strong> is in the order <strong>of</strong> 20.3bps (€263bn*0.0771bps),<br />

on average.<br />

This difference was investigated in more detail by re-estimating the main empirical specification<br />

for indirect effects on a subsample <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> issued by banks participating in <strong>state</strong><br />

guarantee schemes only.<br />

Interestingly, the estimated 15 indirect effect on non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> issued by banks participating in <strong>state</strong><br />

guarantee schemes in the order <strong>of</strong> -0.06bps for each additional €1bn SG bond issue. This suggests<br />

that participation in a <strong>state</strong> guarantee scheme may signal bank-level financial stability that results<br />

in the issuing cost <strong>of</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> being lower than for otherwise similar non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> (although<br />

this effect is not significant due to the small sample size).<br />

Re-estimating the main empirical specification on the impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> guarantees on issuing cost<br />

supports this view. While the average impact <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee on issuing cost is 33.4bps, the<br />

estimated impact for the subsample <strong>of</strong> banks issuing both SG <strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> is 56.7bps.<br />

15 It is important to note that in the context <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the issuance <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong> on the issuance cost <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>and</strong><br />

non-SG <strong>bonds</strong>, an externality is defined as negative if the effect <strong>of</strong> the issuance <strong>of</strong> SG <strong>bonds</strong> is to increase the issuance cost <strong>of</strong> all<br />

<strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> as a positive externality if the effect is to reduce issuance cost.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!