22.10.2013 Views

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability performance<br />

Figure 20: Credit growth <strong>and</strong> bank lending st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

82<br />

Bank credit to private nonfinancial sector<br />

-5 0 5 10<br />

-5 0 5 10<br />

Euro Area<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

UK<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

-20 0 20 40 60<br />

-20 0 20 40 60<br />

Bank lending st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Bank credit to private nonfinancial sector Bank lending st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

Note: 1 Bank lending st<strong>and</strong>ards (net percentage change, a positive number indicates tightening <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards. Net percentage change<br />

refers to the difference between the percentage <strong>of</strong> banks that tightened st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> banks that eased st<strong>and</strong>ards.)<br />

2<br />

Bank credit to private nonfinancial sector (year-on-year percent changes through June 2009.)<br />

Source: IMF (2009): Haver Analytics <strong>and</strong> national sources<br />

However, Figure 20 also shows that despite a tightening <strong>of</strong> credit conditions, lending st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>of</strong><br />

banks in the Euro area <strong>and</strong> the UK were loosening by the end <strong>of</strong> 2008, which is consistent with<br />

banks seeking to extend more loans than they previously were.<br />

The present study analyses trends in lending <strong>and</strong> other balance sheet variables in greater detail.<br />

Firstly, through consideration <strong>of</strong> the period October 2008 to December 2010, which includes more<br />

recent data than was available at the time <strong>of</strong> previous studies, we are able to analyse responses <strong>of</strong><br />

balance sheet variables to <strong>state</strong> guarantees that may be emerging with a time lag.<br />

Secondly, by focusing on individual bank data as opposed to aggregates, we distinguish<br />

developments in the balance sheets <strong>of</strong> banks participating <strong>and</strong> not participating in <strong>state</strong> guarantee<br />

schemes.<br />

And thirdly, we use a difference-in-differences framework that allows us to isolate the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>state</strong> guarantees <strong>and</strong> control for other policies <strong>and</strong> changes in market conditions that may have<br />

affected both participating <strong>and</strong> non-participating banks.<br />

The following sections present an analysis <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>state</strong> guarantees on bank lending,<br />

leverage <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability.<br />

Section 4.3 provides a descriptive analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> on<br />

banks' performance.<br />

Section 4.4 presents the statistical methodology generically, as applied to credit extension.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!