3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability performance<br />
Table 17: Difference in asset <strong>and</strong> liability growth between banks having issued <strong>guaranteed</strong><br />
<strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong> banks having issued eligible <strong>bonds</strong> without guarantee<br />
Balance<br />
sheet item<br />
Net loans (%<br />
change)<br />
Total deposits<br />
<strong>and</strong> other<br />
short-term<br />
funding<br />
Total long-term<br />
funding<br />
Total liabilities<br />
+ equity<br />
Source: London Economics<br />
92<br />
Pre-issue<br />
year<br />
Posts- issue<br />
year<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
banks<br />
Banks having issued<br />
<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong><br />
Mean <strong>of</strong><br />
% change<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
deviation<br />
<strong>of</strong> %<br />
change<br />
Banks having issued eligible<br />
<strong>bonds</strong> without guarantee<br />
Number<br />
<strong>of</strong> banks<br />
Mean <strong>of</strong><br />
% change<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
deviation<br />
<strong>of</strong> %<br />
change<br />
2007 2009 2 1.4% 13.8 63 4.6% 18.3<br />
2007 2010 6 -16.5% 18.5 58 12.4 30.1<br />
2008 2009 6 7.1% 4.1 65 8.9% 15.4<br />
2008 2010 27 9.5% 26.5 59 16.2% 22.6<br />
2009 2010 2 -6.4% 6.7 59 4.4% 13.8<br />
2007 2009 2 -1.8% 5.0 58 5.7% 26.7<br />
2007 2010 6 -3.0% 31.3 57 0.7% 19.4<br />
2008 2009 6 3.6% 11.3 61 8.7 15.8<br />
2008 2010 26 11.9% 24.2 55 9.5% 24.2<br />
2009 2010 2 -6.7% 11.5 59 0.55 20.2<br />
2007 2009 2 26.4% 31.6 65 -7.1 33.7<br />
2007 2010 6 -36.6% 22.4 58 8.2 86.4<br />
2008 2009 5 20.5% 24.5 65 2.4% 31.7<br />
2008 2010 21 8.5% 36.4 57 6.6% 37.3<br />
2009 2010 2 8.9% 27.1 55 -1.4% 24.6<br />
2007 2009 2 5.0% 27.2 65 7.6% 26.8<br />
2007 2010 6 6.1% 36.5 58 14.5% 27.9<br />
2008 2009 5 40.9% 16.5 65 24.7% 21.8<br />
2008 2010 24 16.7% 37.3 57 32.5% 24.8<br />
2009 2010 2 2.6% 4.1 59 6.5& 14.3