22.10.2013 Views

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

3 Issuing costs of state guaranteed bonds - Financial Risk and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> on bank lending, funding <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability performance<br />

Table 18: Difference in pr<strong>of</strong>it performance between banks having issued <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

banks having issued eligible <strong>bonds</strong> without guarantee<br />

Balance<br />

sheet item<br />

Pre-issue<br />

year<br />

Net interest income / total<br />

liabilities + equity (% change)<br />

Operating income / total liabilities<br />

+ equity (% change)<br />

Source: London Economics<br />

Posts- issue<br />

year<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

banks<br />

Banks having issued<br />

<strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong><br />

Mean <strong>of</strong><br />

% change<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> %<br />

change<br />

Banks having issued eligible<br />

<strong>bonds</strong> without guarantee<br />

Number<br />

<strong>of</strong> banks<br />

Mean <strong>of</strong><br />

% change<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation<br />

<strong>of</strong> %<br />

change<br />

2007 2009 1 -30.9% - 63 12.5% 30.5<br />

2007 2010 6 -3.6% 34.4 58 12.4% 30.1<br />

2008 2009 6 2.3% 29.8 65 10.6% 25.1<br />

2008 2010 26 -11.2% 25.2 58 9.8% 26.0<br />

2009 2010 2 -6.5% 4.9 59 0.8% 19.1<br />

2007 2009 1 -11.6 - 62 1.9% 25.5<br />

2007 2010 6 -1.4 22.1 58 9.8% 26.0<br />

2008 2009 5 5.0% 17.6 57 12.7% 27.6<br />

2008 2010 24 -1.4% 30.7 51 13.6% 26.9<br />

2009 2010 2 -1.1% 4.5 58 -0.9% 17.3<br />

4.4 Econometric analysis <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong> <strong>bonds</strong><br />

on banks’ performance<br />

4.4.1 Empirical research strategy<br />

The empirical research strategy adopted for the assessment <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong><br />

<strong>bonds</strong> on bank outcomes is the counterfactual approach whereby the performance <strong>of</strong> a relevant<br />

control group <strong>of</strong> banks that did not participate in <strong>state</strong> guarantee schemes or receive ad hoc<br />

guarantees ('non-participating' banks) is compared to the performance <strong>of</strong> banks that did not<br />

participate in <strong>state</strong> guarantee schemes or received ad hoc guarantees ('participating' banks).<br />

The bank sample used in the analysis consists <strong>of</strong> participating <strong>and</strong> non-participating banks that<br />

issued <strong>bonds</strong> that were, or would have been eligible to be, <strong>state</strong> <strong>guaranteed</strong>. That is, bank selection<br />

is based on the issuers behind the SG <strong>and</strong> non-SG <strong>bonds</strong> considered in Section 2.<br />

The average impact <strong>of</strong> a <strong>state</strong> guarantee on bank outcomes is estimated by taking the differencein-differences<br />

<strong>of</strong> bank outcomes <strong>of</strong> participating <strong>and</strong> non-participating banks, controlling for other<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> bank outcomes that are observed <strong>and</strong> can be measured.<br />

Estimating the difference-in-differences involves several steps. Below, we provide an illustration<br />

based on 2 banks only, a participating bank <strong>and</strong> a non-participating bank.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!