09.11.2013 Views

A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute

A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute

A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Copyright Bruce Nixon 2010. All rights reserved. Th<strong>is</strong> electronic copy <strong>is</strong> provided free for personal, non-commercial use only.<br />

www.brucenixon.com<br />

leaders to introduce a Currency Transaction Levy to meet the aid revenue shortfall and safeguard lives from<br />

the worst ravages of the economic storm (Stamp Out Poverty). One unanswered question <strong>is</strong> how such a<br />

global tax would be enforced (<strong>Global</strong> Tax - The International Debate Education Association (IDEA)). Ideally a<br />

levy would be managed by the UN but some countries in Latin America have already implemented levies.<br />

Recently some support amongst senior EU politicians has been emerging, especially in Germany.<br />

Reducing the over $1 trillion annually countries spend on military hardware. For the London G20 Summit in<br />

April 2009, Hazel Henderson’s proposed reducing the over $1 trillion annually spent on military hardware:<br />

“The summiteers can agree on the proposed United Nations Security Insurance Agency (UNSIA). Militar<strong>is</strong>m <strong>is</strong><br />

ever-less useful in resolving today’s conflicts in Iraq, Afghan<strong>is</strong>tan and other guerrilla insurgencies. Th<strong>is</strong> UNSIA<br />

proposal, backed by four Nobel laureates, would allow countries which w<strong>is</strong>hed to follow Costa Rica’s lead in<br />

1947 and abol<strong>is</strong>h their armed forces. Instead, countries could buy the insurance of a peacekeeping force from<br />

the UN Security Council (expanded and veto-less). ……. The premiums would fund a standing, properly<br />

trained UN peace-keeping force and complimentary contingents of NGO peace-making conflict-resolution<br />

groups. The UNSIA proposal <strong>is</strong> taught in many university programs and was debated in the UN Security<br />

Council in 1996 (see UNSIA). Th<strong>is</strong> and other proposals, including the Foreign Exchange Transaction Reporting<br />

System (FXTRS) for Central Banks (Foreign Exchange Transaction Reporting System (FXTRS), are also<br />

described in The United Nations Policy and Financing Alternatives, (1995) (UN Policy and Financing<br />

Alternatives and Henderson, H).<br />

Perverse National Public Spending<br />

Perverse subsidies are another global <strong>is</strong>sue. It <strong>is</strong> estimated that $1.5 to $2 trillion a year <strong>is</strong> spent <strong>world</strong>wide<br />

on perverse subsidies, which encourage economically, socially and environmentally damaging activities.<br />

These include the subsidies from rich-country governments to their farming and agricultural sectors, most of<br />

which go to large instead of small farmers and small organic farmers who most need help. Combined with<br />

tariffs against imported food, these subsidies devastate these sectors in poorer countries and expose the<br />

hypocr<strong>is</strong>y of rich-country support for free trade. But there are many other examples of perverse subsidies<br />

such as subsidies to the oil industry which d<strong>is</strong>gu<strong>is</strong>e the full costs of extraction and supply.<br />

German subsidies for coal mining are so large that it would be economically efficient for the government to<br />

close down all the mines and send the workers home on full pay for the rest of their lives. The environment<br />

would benefit too. Subsidies for agriculture foster over-loading of croplands, leading to erosion of topsoil,<br />

pollution from synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and release of greenhouse gases. Subsidies for fossil fuels<br />

aggravate pollution such as acid rain, urban smog and contribute to global warming. Subsidies for road<br />

transportation promote some of the worst and most widespread forms of pollution. Subsidies for water<br />

encourage m<strong>is</strong>use and over-use of supplies that are increasingly scarce in many lands. Subsidies for ocean<br />

f<strong>is</strong>heries foster over-harvesting of f<strong>is</strong>h stocks. Forestry subsidies encourage over-logging and other forms of<br />

deforestation. Apart from the environmental and economic costs, these subsidies act as direct drains on<br />

economies. Perverse subsidies in just these six sectors total at least $2 trillion per year.<br />

Th<strong>is</strong> enormous sum contrasts markedly with the inadequate subsidies to green energy. Systematic national<br />

and international measures are needed to reduce these perverse subsidies, year by year, and transfer the<br />

money to green energy subsidies for both consumers and producers.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The proposals in th<strong>is</strong> chapter, offer the prospect of:<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!