A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute
A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute
A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Copyright Bruce Nixon 2010. All rights reserved. Th<strong>is</strong> electronic copy <strong>is</strong> provided free for personal, non-commercial use only.<br />
www.brucenixon.com<br />
Section B - Peak Oil and its impact on our lives<br />
World leaders are still calling for the continuation economic growth and of global trade free on a<br />
vast scale. Yet both are dependent on abundant fossil fuel and simply unsustainable. Peak oil and climate<br />
change combine to create a dual cr<strong>is</strong><strong>is</strong>, an emergency requiring urgent action we are not taking. We are<br />
behaving as if we can restore the status quo. We are squandering a precious commodity. It’s insanity!<br />
“The definition of insanity <strong>is</strong> doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. Albert<br />
Einstein<br />
Most experts say that oil supplies have peaked or will do so within a few years. The Association for the Study<br />
of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO) says “regular” oil peaked in 2005 and oil and gas combined will peak in 2015.<br />
Three years ago the price was $55 per barrel. In June 2008, before the recession, Gazprom predicted $250 in<br />
2009. In July 2008, it rose to $147. By 19 th January, 2009, it was down to $35, the lowest price for many years!<br />
The recession <strong>is</strong> keeping consumption and prices down. Ultimately prices will escalate. The International<br />
Energy Agency (IEA) expects oil prices to return to $100 per barrel before 2015.<br />
Oil from tar sands As the best reserves are exhausted, oil companies are starting to extract oil from tar sand<br />
reserves beneath the boreal forest that stretches across Russia, Canada, Alaska and Scandinavia. The forests<br />
destroyed in the process are enormous carbon sinks that absorb large amounts of carbon. Extracting oil in<br />
th<strong>is</strong> way will be harder, costlier and more polluting. Producing oil from tar sands unleashes two to three times<br />
more pollution than conventionally produced oil. Th<strong>is</strong> defeats our efforts to cut carbon em<strong>is</strong>sions. The<br />
refining process requires large amounts of toxic chemicals. The current development of oil production from<br />
the oil sands of Alberta <strong>is</strong> the biggest construction project on the planet. Pr<strong>is</strong>tine forests and sensitive<br />
wetlands are being destroyed and toxic lakes are being created. Birds die on contact with the water and<br />
mutated f<strong>is</strong>h are found downstream. Cancer rates amongst aboriginal people living downstream are reported<br />
to be suffering d<strong>is</strong>proportionately high rates of cancer. Ultimately the toxic waste ends up in the Arctic<br />
Ocean, destroying ecosystems on its way.<br />
Yet, oil companies are ruthlessly pursuing th<strong>is</strong> for profit, perpetuating an unsustainable way of life, and acting<br />
as if we did not face a cr<strong>is</strong><strong>is</strong>. Such developments involve not only oil companies but many large corporations<br />
supplying them and banks providing capital. Your ban may be involved. For further information and action<br />
you can take, read Ethical Consumer, Stop the Oil Sands, July/August 2009.<br />
George Monbiot says no one really knows when oil production will peak – gas will come later and coal much<br />
later – whether ten or thirty years hence, but warns that we may face simultaneously catastrophic climate<br />
change and an unprecedented global depression. Not only are we running out of oil and natural gas and, in<br />
the long term, coal and uranium, we are running out of most major materials used in manufacturing.<br />
Although coal <strong>is</strong> likely to last much longer, it <strong>is</strong> extremely polluting. Carbon capture, not available on a large<br />
scale, cannot be guaranteed to work and <strong>is</strong> likely to be expensive. Those who favour a nuclear solution argue<br />
that reserves of uranium will last a long time and the amounts required are small. If objections to its use are<br />
accepted, we shall have to find renewable alternatives.<br />
55