A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute
A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute
A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Copyright Bruce Nixon 2010. All rights reserved. Th<strong>is</strong> electronic copy <strong>is</strong> provided free for personal, non-commercial use only.<br />
www.brucenixon.com<br />
and Spoleto in parts of which cars are excluded. They are hol<strong>is</strong>tic and exemplify Herbert Girardet’s and<br />
Richard Rogers’ models.<br />
What we do not know intuitively. The places we live in must now have low ecological and carbon footprints.<br />
That <strong>is</strong> the huge challenge facing us. There <strong>is</strong> a limit to what individual citizens and citizen’s organ<strong>is</strong>ations like<br />
a Transition Town can do. Only government and councils can provide the infrastructure and services<br />
necessary to help our towns and communities adapt to climate change and peak oil: - <strong>better</strong> transport, more<br />
room for cycl<strong>is</strong>ts and pedestrians, ways of reducing congestion, <strong>better</strong> waste d<strong>is</strong>posal for small businesses,<br />
<strong>better</strong> town planning, <strong>better</strong> design and building of sustainable developments including up to date heat and<br />
power and space for vegetable growing and wild life. Woking, Sutton, Br<strong>is</strong>tol and Nottingham are shining<br />
examples.<br />
The destruction of our towns, cities and communities<br />
“Clone town Britain” has already been described. Beautiful, h<strong>is</strong>toric, homely small-scale areas in our towns<br />
and cities, with small shops, where people feel a sense of community and roots, are destroyed without our<br />
agreement. It <strong>is</strong> an outrage when, in order to meet imposed regional targets, the w<strong>is</strong>hes of citizens are<br />
ignored and unsustainable, out-of-scale, poor quality developments are created, lacking proper<br />
infrastructure, or adequate consideration of the limits of the eco-system and the needs of people facing peak<br />
oil and climate change.<br />
Something similar to the Haussmann<strong>is</strong>ation of Par<strong>is</strong> in the nineteenth century happened in UK after World<br />
War Two. But the results were not good. Post war redevelopment went too far and was a huge<br />
d<strong>is</strong>appointment. “Slum clearance” and redevelopment destroyed more of Georgian and Victorian London<br />
than Hitler’s bombs. Swathes of potentially sustainable communities were levelled. “Clone Towns” were<br />
inflicted on almost every town and city by multinational chains, superstores, supermarkets- ugly roads too.<br />
New Labour planned to demol<strong>is</strong>h 250,000 houses in the North of England, and build a million new homes in<br />
the North and South of England. Is th<strong>is</strong> the right way to go? We have had an increasingly strong conservation<br />
movement since the Sixties, e.g. the Victorian Society and other pressure groups like the Homes Under<br />
Threat (HUT).<br />
The Sustainable Communities Act, if adopted by councils, and the coalition’s Big Society v<strong>is</strong>ion, giving more<br />
power to citizens, can help communities halt th<strong>is</strong> damage and become more sustainable. Pressure works.<br />
What kind of <strong>world</strong> do we want to build?<br />
In Chapter 11, I argued that vast new developments, regeneration schemes, privately managed and policed,<br />
are a threat to democracy and civil liberties. I drew attention to the growing trend towards the gated<br />
communities in Britain with “hot spots” of affluence and “cold spots” of exclusion. These reflect a post<br />
industrial economy in which there are on the one hand increasingly wealthy, high earning, knowledge<br />
workers in global<strong>is</strong>ed financial services industries and, on the other, r<strong>is</strong>ing numbers of “excluded” people on<br />
very low pay, of whom 2.7m are on sickness benefit or have dropped out of the system into the “black<br />
economy”.<br />
178