09.11.2013 Views

A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute

A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute

A better world is possible - Global Commons Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Copyright Bruce Nixon 2010. All rights reserved. Th<strong>is</strong> electronic copy <strong>is</strong> provided free for personal, non-commercial use only.<br />

www.brucenixon.com<br />

Section D - Poverty and economic injustice<br />

In writing th<strong>is</strong> section, I am much indebted to David Woodward and h<strong>is</strong> report for the New Economics<br />

Foundation report, “Growth <strong>is</strong>n’t working”, January, 2006.<br />

Growth <strong>is</strong>n’t working. Vandana Shiva calls the current credo of global institutions, national and regional<br />

governments and big business: mono-thinking and mono-culture. It <strong>is</strong> mono-everything. Th<strong>is</strong> one size fits all<br />

policy requires continuous economic growth, measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - a m<strong>is</strong>nomer, as<br />

really it <strong>is</strong> Gross Domestic Cost (GDC). It also demands unfettered free trade. That flies in the face of<br />

economic h<strong>is</strong>tory. Nascent economies require protection. Trade liberal<strong>is</strong>ation has not brought the benefits<br />

we were given to expect. Growing wealth <strong>is</strong> concentrated in fewer people.<br />

Rapid economic growth <strong>is</strong> far too slow in reducing poverty. If global GDP per capita continued to grow at<br />

around 2% pa, it would take more than a century to reduce poverty below the $1- a - day level. Between<br />

1990 and 2001 the incomes of those below $1 a day grew only half as fast as global GDP. If th<strong>is</strong> trend were to<br />

continue, their incomes would r<strong>is</strong>e by only 1% per year, and the process to reduce poverty below the $1- a -<br />

day level would take more than 200 years, and require the global economy to expand to more than 60 times<br />

its current size even without population growth .<br />

Continuous economic growth <strong>is</strong>n’t working<br />

Until the eighties the poverty gap was closing<br />

Between 1990 and 2001, for every $100 of growth in the World’s per person income, only $0.60<br />

contributed to reducing poverty below the $1 - a - day level<br />

UK growth benefits the richest 10 % 10 times as much as the poorest 10 %<br />

UK top executives earn nearly 100 times more than a typical employee. Ten years ago the differential<br />

was 39<br />

US CEOs were paid 344 times more than workers in 2008,up from 104 in 1991<br />

The wealth of the <strong>world</strong>'s 475 billionaires <strong>is</strong> now more than the combined income of the bottom half<br />

of humanity<br />

The richest 1% of adults in the <strong>world</strong> own 40% of the planet's wealth<br />

More wealth does not = more happiness – beyond a certain point<br />

Where the income gap <strong>is</strong> highest so are all the measures of unhappiness<br />

A recent UN-Habitat report said the wealth gap <strong>is</strong> creating a social time bomb of unrest and increased<br />

mortality.<br />

India has dramatic poverty after sixty years of independence. It <strong>is</strong> not being helped by large corporations or<br />

the industrial<strong>is</strong>ation of agriculture. Well over 100,000 farmers have committed suicide since 1993, largely as<br />

a result of debt and failed GM crops. <strong>Global</strong><strong>is</strong>ation <strong>is</strong> certainly not working for the 73 per cent of Indians<br />

dependant on agriculture or the 280m poor living in India’s 600,000 villages or the slums of Mumbai. Often,<br />

the process of rapid economic development deprives poor people of the land – the only thing they can<br />

depend on for their living. Compensation for the loss of land <strong>is</strong> useless.<br />

New Delhi authorities, in their attempts to western<strong>is</strong>e their city by sweeping food stalls off the streets, are<br />

destroying a source of cheap, nour<strong>is</strong>hing food and putting poor people out of work. What replaces street<br />

food will be more expensive and less healthy “fast food”. There <strong>is</strong> also a battle going on between those who<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!