21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 - Experimental setup and test procedure<br />

were mounted on the measurement frame, allowing to record three groups of three 1D profiles<br />

(constituting one 3D profiles) simultaneously to accelerate the data acquisition (see also HERS-<br />

BERGER, 2002).<br />

The used probes had an emitting frequency of 2 MHz. The frequency of the finally acquired profile<br />

depends on the measurement depth; most samples were recorded at 77 Hz (measurement<br />

depth of 30 cm). The technical specifications of the velocity profiler and the probes can be found<br />

in Appendix 2.1.2. A multiplexer (Fig. 4.17, next to number. 5) allowed switching between the different<br />

UVP-probes.<br />

Velocity profiles were recorded for all measurement points on a 9 x 9 cm grid. But due to the big<br />

amount of data, only the measurements in one cross-section is given for each frame position (center<br />

of the measurement frame) in Appendix . These profiles are exactly perpendicular to the channel<br />

axis (Fig. 4.19).<br />

Frame Position<br />

7<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

25°<br />

10°<br />

8<br />

9 10<br />

Probe<br />

70° 85° +1m<br />

support<br />

55° 40°<br />

9 probes<br />

<strong>12</strong>8 meas.<br />

points<br />

Instantaneous<br />

measurement<br />

(= 1 profil)<br />

3<br />

-1m<br />

File<br />

Header<br />

1 bloc (1 probe)<br />

(Profil 1)<br />

Probe support<br />

Position 1 (= 1 file)<br />

Probe 1 = Bloc 1<br />

… 9 blocs<br />

…<br />

(Profil 64)<br />

<strong>12</strong>8 points<br />

Figure 4.19: Frame positions and file format of the velocity raw data<br />

Several specific problems due to the complexity of the flow field in bends had to be solved:<br />

1. The measured velocities in tangential direction were rather high (up to 1.5 m/s),<br />

2. the radial velocities were an order of magnitude smaller than the velocities in tangential<br />

direction and<br />

3. the radial velocities were positive and negative due to the secondary flow.<br />

page 86 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!