21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Analysis of the sediment transport<br />

The higher discharges (Figure 6.17 center and bottom) show an almost constant transport rate<br />

(a slightly decreasing tendency can be figured out for the case without macro-roughness). This is<br />

mainly due to the circumstance that the tests were performed as a series with increasing discharge.<br />

The bed was only levelled after the first test (Q = 150 l/s). The next tests continued with the bed<br />

topography of the previous test. Since the discharges were high enough to provoke bed changes<br />

this was no problem, but as far as the sediment transport is concerned, the bed was already<br />

armored; therefore the sediments introduced at the inlet were transported over the armoring layer<br />

to the outlet.<br />

In the presence of macro-roughness, a natural river, subject to a constant sediment transport rate<br />

will compensate the reduced transport capacity in the bend by steepening the slope in the bend:<br />

Upstream the bend, the water depth increases locally. Therefore the transport capacity is reduced<br />

and sediments accumulate in the inlet reach. The overall channel slope increases, till it is sufficient<br />

to pass the bedload across the bend. The increased slope leads to higher velocities in the exit<br />

reach, inducing some additional erosion after the curve.<br />

This phenomenon was observed during the preliminary tests, for which the sediment transport<br />

rate was kept constant (Figure 6.18 and Appendix 3.3.3). For a discharge of 170 l/s respectively<br />

210 l/s the overall bed slope increased by about 40%, respectively 50% from the initial value<br />

(0.50%).<br />

Difference to initial bed level [mm]<br />

100<br />

0<br />

-100<br />

-200<br />

-300<br />

-400<br />

Comparison of the bed levels with and without macro-roughness - Q = 2<strong>12</strong>.5 l/s<br />

Q=2<strong>12</strong>.5 l/s without mr, avg<br />

Q=2<strong>12</strong>.5 l/s with mr, avg<br />

Q=2<strong>12</strong>.5 l/s, Difference, avg<br />

Bend<br />

-500<br />

-100<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25<br />

Distance to the inlet [m]<br />

Figure 6.18: Changes of the average bed level for the preliminary tests (with and without ribs) at a constant sediment<br />

transport rate<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Difference between without / with mr<br />

[mm]<br />

<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!