pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 7 - Establishing an empirical formula<br />
b) Polynomial function of the 3rd degree - uncentered<br />
To shift the inflection point towards the outer bank, the coefficient<br />
equations 7.8 and 7.9 by c 2 = R c + ξ ⋅ B :<br />
is replaced in<br />
The boundary conditions become:<br />
1. dh s ( R c + ξ ⋅ B) ⁄ dr = tanφ∗<br />
(maximum bed slope).<br />
2. h s ( R c + ξ ⋅ B) = h m : the water depth at the inflection point is equal to the mean water<br />
depth in the cross-section.<br />
3. dh s ( r o ) ⁄ dr = 0 : the transversal bed slope is equal to zero at the outer side wall.<br />
Equations 7.8 and 7.9 give the following equations after introduction of these boundary conditions:<br />
h s = h m + tanφ∗<br />
⋅<br />
dh<br />
------- s<br />
= tanφ∗<br />
dr<br />
(7.<strong>12</strong>)<br />
(7.13)<br />
Without any correction factor ( tanφ∗<br />
= tanφ<br />
) and putting ξ = 8 %, a correlation of<br />
R 2 = 0.71 is obtained between measured and computed maximum scour depth (see Fig. 7.5).<br />
Introducing the following correction factor c and putting ξ = 10 %, increases the correlation to<br />
R 2 = 0.82 (compared to the maximum scour over the bend h <strong>12</strong>,<br />
max ):<br />
tanφ∗<br />
c ⋅ tanφ<br />
20 ⎛195 ⋅ S eall ,<br />
1.1 h m<br />
+ ⋅ -----⎞<br />
V⋅<br />
R h<br />
= = ⋅ ⋅ ----------------- ⋅ tanφ<br />
(7.14)<br />
⎝<br />
B ⎠<br />
g⋅<br />
B 3<br />
It is obvious (Fig. 7.5) that the obtained equation does not fit well to the observed cross-section.<br />
Especially the inner bank elevation is much too high. There are two reasons for this:<br />
• The fact that the bed slope at the outer wall is fixed to zero avoids a flatter bed slope.<br />
• The fixed water depth ( )at the inflection point makes it impossible to get a vertical<br />
adjustment of the equation.<br />
Therefore tests with the same equation and the same boundary conditions were carried out, but<br />
with a horizontal bed slope at the inner side wall. The coefficient ( – ) 2 in equations 7.<strong>12</strong> and<br />
7.13 becomes ( 1 + 2ξ) 2 . Putting ξ = 16 % without any other correction factor gives a correlation<br />
of R 2 = 0.74 . If the correction factor c = 6.8 ⋅ hm ⁄ B – 4.5 ⋅ V ⋅ R h ⁄ g ⋅ B 3 is used with<br />
ξ = 5 %, the correlation can be increased to 0.78, which still is not very satisfying.<br />
c 2<br />
=<br />
R c<br />
4<br />
– ---------------------------------------<br />
3 ⋅ B 2 ⋅ ( 1 – 2ξ) 2 ⋅ ( r– R c – ξB) 3 + ( r – R c – ξB)<br />
⋅<br />
4<br />
– --------------------------------<br />
B 2 ⋅ ( 1 – 2ξ) 2 ⋅ ( r– R c – ξB) 2 + 1<br />
h m<br />
1 2ξ<br />
page 162 / November 9, 2002<br />
Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring