21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 - Establishing an empirical formula<br />

b) Polynomial function of the 3rd degree - uncentered<br />

To shift the inflection point towards the outer bank, the coefficient<br />

equations 7.8 and 7.9 by c 2 = R c + ξ ⋅ B :<br />

is replaced in<br />

The boundary conditions become:<br />

1. dh s ( R c + ξ ⋅ B) ⁄ dr = tanφ∗<br />

(maximum bed slope).<br />

2. h s ( R c + ξ ⋅ B) = h m : the water depth at the inflection point is equal to the mean water<br />

depth in the cross-section.<br />

3. dh s ( r o ) ⁄ dr = 0 : the transversal bed slope is equal to zero at the outer side wall.<br />

Equations 7.8 and 7.9 give the following equations after introduction of these boundary conditions:<br />

h s = h m + tanφ∗<br />

⋅<br />

dh<br />

------- s<br />

= tanφ∗<br />

dr<br />

(7.<strong>12</strong>)<br />

(7.13)<br />

Without any correction factor ( tanφ∗<br />

= tanφ<br />

) and putting ξ = 8 %, a correlation of<br />

R 2 = 0.71 is obtained between measured and computed maximum scour depth (see Fig. 7.5).<br />

Introducing the following correction factor c and putting ξ = 10 %, increases the correlation to<br />

R 2 = 0.82 (compared to the maximum scour over the bend h <strong>12</strong>,<br />

max ):<br />

tanφ∗<br />

c ⋅ tanφ<br />

20 ⎛195 ⋅ S eall ,<br />

1.1 h m<br />

+ ⋅ -----⎞<br />

V⋅<br />

R h<br />

= = ⋅ ⋅ ----------------- ⋅ tanφ<br />

(7.14)<br />

⎝<br />

B ⎠<br />

g⋅<br />

B 3<br />

It is obvious (Fig. 7.5) that the obtained equation does not fit well to the observed cross-section.<br />

Especially the inner bank elevation is much too high. There are two reasons for this:<br />

• The fact that the bed slope at the outer wall is fixed to zero avoids a flatter bed slope.<br />

• The fixed water depth ( )at the inflection point makes it impossible to get a vertical<br />

adjustment of the equation.<br />

Therefore tests with the same equation and the same boundary conditions were carried out, but<br />

with a horizontal bed slope at the inner side wall. The coefficient ( – ) 2 in equations 7.<strong>12</strong> and<br />

7.13 becomes ( 1 + 2ξ) 2 . Putting ξ = 16 % without any other correction factor gives a correlation<br />

of R 2 = 0.74 . If the correction factor c = 6.8 ⋅ hm ⁄ B – 4.5 ⋅ V ⋅ R h ⁄ g ⋅ B 3 is used with<br />

ξ = 5 %, the correlation can be increased to 0.78, which still is not very satisfying.<br />

c 2<br />

=<br />

R c<br />

4<br />

– ---------------------------------------<br />

3 ⋅ B 2 ⋅ ( 1 – 2ξ) 2 ⋅ ( r– R c – ξB) 3 + ( r – R c – ξB)<br />

⋅<br />

4<br />

– --------------------------------<br />

B 2 ⋅ ( 1 – 2ξ) 2 ⋅ ( r– R c – ξB) 2 + 1<br />

h m<br />

1 2ξ<br />

page 162 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!