pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Analysis of the final scour<br />
The macro-roughness has the advantage to reduce the oscillations of the free water surface long<br />
the outer side wall. The wave amplitude is reduced by 50% from about 10 cm (~50% of h m ) to<br />
about 5 cm (~25% of ).<br />
h m<br />
At the outer bank, the water surface is normally super elevated by 2 to 4 cm (~10 to 15% of )<br />
due to the influence of the curve. With macro-roughness, the superelevation remains the same<br />
order of magnitude or gets smaller (Appendix 7 and 8). The superelevation ∆h of the free water<br />
surface can be calculated as 1 :<br />
B⋅<br />
R c<br />
∆h = --------------- ⋅ -------<br />
⋅ 2g<br />
The measured and the computed water superelevation agree quite well.<br />
R i<br />
Since the ribs introduce a head loss in the bend, the water depth upstream the bend increases. For<br />
the performed tests the water depth increased by 10 to 20% depending essentially on the discharge<br />
(Appendix 7 and 8). In the bend, the mean water level remains about 10% higher than without<br />
ribs.<br />
Combining the different effects of the presence of macro-roughness - the reduction of the oscillations,<br />
the increased mean water level and the superelevation due to the curve - the highest water<br />
levels in the bend remain about the same as without ribs.<br />
Another interesting phenomenon is the flow separation that can be observed when the depositions<br />
are quite important (Figure 6.13). This separation is visible both at the first and the second<br />
scour location.<br />
Furthermore the flow at the water surface carries any floating object towards the center of the<br />
channel. This is valid for all tested configurations. An object placed anywhere in the cross-section<br />
upstream the bend, leaves the bend more or less in the center. The phenomenon remains the same<br />
with and without macro-roughness. It can be explained with the velocity field concentrating at the<br />
beginning of the bend in the center (attracting objects near the inner wall towards the center). Farther<br />
downstream, the stationary waves or shock waves deflect floating objects towards the center.<br />
R o<br />
V m<br />
2<br />
h m<br />
(6.2)<br />
1. This formula applies for the case without macro-roughness. But, since the superelevation of the<br />
free water surface in radial direction remains about the same with ribs, the same equation can be<br />
used.<br />
<strong>EPFL</strong> Ph.D thesis 2632 - Daniel S. Hersberger November 9, 2002 / page <strong>12</strong>7