21.11.2013 Views

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

pdf, 12 MiB - Infoscience - EPFL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 - Theoretical considerations<br />

where Q 0<br />

is the part of the discharge acting on the bed. The term ( Q 0<br />

⁄ Q) ⋅ h accounts for the<br />

influence of the side walls. This term can be replaced by R h0 . The coefficient ( K 0<br />

⁄ K S<br />

) 1.5 introduces<br />

the bedforms in the equation. MEYER-PETER & MÜLLER did not give a formula to determine<br />

K 0 . If the water depth h and the discharge Q are known, the influence of the bedforms can<br />

be computed with<br />

K<br />

K S<br />

⋅ K w<br />

⋅ B 0.67<br />

0<br />

= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

(3.47)<br />

1.5<br />

1.5 1.5<br />

[ B ⋅ K w<br />

+ 2 ⋅h ⋅( K w<br />

– K S<br />

)] 0.67<br />

is the roughness coefficient computed with Strickler’s formula (eq. 3.11)<br />

K S<br />

4) Smart & Jäggi (1983)<br />

SMART & JÄGGI (1983) extended the method of MEYER-PETER & MÜLLER (1948) to channels<br />

and rivers with steeper slopes. They based their study on an additional set of tests in a 10 and<br />

20 cm wide flume with bed slopes between 3 and 20 %. Based on their results and on the tests of<br />

MEYER-PETER & MÜLLER, they proposed the following relation to compute the sediment transport<br />

capacity:<br />

Q b<br />

B 4 ⋅ ρ s<br />

----------- ⎛<br />

d<br />

------ 90 ⎞ 0.2 (3.48)<br />

s – 1 ⎝ ⎠<br />

R 0<br />

V S 1.6 θ<br />

1 cr<br />

⋅ ( s – 1) ⋅ d<br />

= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⎛ – -------------------------------------- m ⎞<br />

⎝ ⋅ S ⎠<br />

d 30<br />

R 0<br />

which is equivalent to<br />

d 90<br />

V<br />

Φ = 4 ⋅ ------ ⋅ ⎛------⎞ 0.2 ⋅ S 0.6 ⋅ θ<br />

V∗ ⎝ ⎠<br />

0.5 ⋅ ( θ–<br />

θ cr<br />

)<br />

d 30<br />

(3.49)<br />

With θ cr<br />

= 0.050 , the authors used a slightly higher value compared to MEYER-PETER &<br />

MÜLLER (1948). The sediment transport rate depends only weakly on the coefficient<br />

( d 90<br />

⁄ d 30<br />

) 0.2 . Neglecting this coefficient (put to 1.05) and assuming a relative sediment density of<br />

s = 2.68 , the sediment transport rate can be computed with the following simplified formula:<br />

Q b<br />

2.5 B q S 0.6 d<br />

= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅⎛S<br />

– -------------------- m ⎞<br />

(3.50)<br />

⎝ <strong>12</strong>.1 ⋅ h ⎠ m<br />

The correlations of equations 3.48 and 3.50 are of r 2 = 0.97 respectively r 2 = 0.95 and standard<br />

errors of s E<br />

= 66 % respectively s E<br />

= 22 % compared with the tests of MEYER-PETER &<br />

MÜLLER.<br />

HUNZIKER (1995) performed another extension of MEYER-PETER & MÜLLER’S formula, allowing<br />

the computation of the sediment transport rate for each sediment fraction of the bed material (see<br />

3.4.3/5)).<br />

5) Hunziker (1995)<br />

In the frame set of his study on sediment transport by grain size fractions, HUNZIKER (1995) analyzed<br />

the results of ZARN (1997) which were performed in a 3 m wide and 26 m long channel. He<br />

further analyzed the results of MEYER-PETER & MÜLLER (1948) and observed a systematic over-<br />

page 38 / November 9, 2002<br />

Wall roughness effects on flow and scouring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!